Ring strain

In organic chemistry, ring strain is a type of instability that exists when bonds in a molecule form angles that are abnormal. Strain is most commonly discussed for small rings such as cyclopropanes and cyclobutanes, whose internal angles are substantially smaller than the idealized value of approximately 109°. Because of their high strain, the heat of combustion for these small rings is elevated.[1][2]

Ring strain results from a combination of angle strain, conformational strain or Pitzer strain (torsional eclipsing interactions), and transannular strain, also known as van der Waals strain or Prelog strain. The simplest examples of angle strain are small cycloalkanes such as cyclopropane and cyclobutane.

Ring strain energy can be attributed to the energy required for the distortion of bond and bond angles in order to close a ring.[3]

Ring strain energy is believed to be the cause of accelerated rates in altering ring reactions. Its interactions with traditional bond energies change the enthalpies of compounds effecting the kinetics and thermodynamics of ring strain reactions.[4]

History

Ring strain theory was first developed by German chemist Adolf von Bayer in 1890.  Previously, the only bonds believed to exist were torsional and steric; however, Bayer's theory became based on the interactions between the two strains.  

Bayer's theory was based on the assumption that ringed compounds were flat. Later, around the same time, Hermann Sachse formed his postulation that compound rings were not flat and potentially existed in a "chair" formation.  Ernst Mohr later combined the two theories to explain the stability of six-membered rings and their frequency in nature, as well as the energy levels of other ring structures.[5]

Angle strain (Baeyer strain)

Alkanes

In alkanes, optimum overlap of atomic orbitals is achieved at 109.5°. The most common cyclic compounds have five or six carbons in their ring.[6] Adolf von Baeyer received a Nobel Prize in 1905 for the discovery of the Baeyer strain theory, which was an explanation of the relative stabilities of cyclic molecules in 1885.[6]

Angle strain occurs when bond angles deviate from the ideal bond angles to achieve maximum bond strength in a specific chemical conformation. Angle strain typically affects cyclic molecules, which lack the flexibility of acyclic molecules.

Angle strain destabilizes a molecule, as manifested in higher reactivity and elevated heat of combustion. Maximum bond strength results from effective overlap of atomic orbitals in a chemical bond. A quantitative measure for angle strain is strain energy. Angle strain and torsional strain combine to create ring strain that affects cyclic molecules.[6]

Normalized energies that allow comparison of ring strains are obtained by measuring per methylene group (CH2) of the molar heat of combustion in the cycloalkanes.[6]

ΔHcombustion per CH2 − 658.6 kJ = strain per CH2

The value 658.6 kJ per mole is obtained from an unstrained long-chain alkane.[6]

Strain of some common cycloalkane ring-sizes[7]
Ring size Strain energy (kcal/mol) Ring size Strain energy (kcal/mol)
3 27.5 10 12.4
4 26.3 11 11.3
5 6.2 12 4.1
6 0.1 13 5.2
7 6.2 14 1.9
8 9.7 15 1.9
9 12.6 16 2.0

Cycloalkanes generally have less ring strain than cycloalkenes, which is seen when comparing cyclopropane and cyclopropene.[8]

Angle strain in alkenes

Cyclic alkenes are subject to strain resulting from distortion of the sp2-hybridized carbon centers. Illustrative is C60 where the carbon centres are pyramidalized. This distortion enhances the reactivity of this molecule. Angle strain also is the basis of Bredt's rule which dictates that bridgehead carbon centers are not incorporated in alkenes because the resulting alkene would be subject to extreme angle strain.

Small trans-cycloalkenes have so much ring strain they cannot exist for extended periods of time.[9] For instance, the smallest trans-cycloalkane that has been isolated is trans-cyclooctene. Trans-cycloheptene has been detected via spectrophotometry for minute time periods, and trans-cyclohexene is thought to be an intermediate in some reactions. No smaller trans-cycloalkenes are known. On the contrary, while small cis-cycloalkenes do have ring strain, they have much less ring strain than small trans-cycloalkenes.[9]

In general, the increased levels of unsaturation in alkenes leads to higher ring strain. Increasing unsaturation leads to greater ring strain in cyclopropene. [8] Therefore, cyclopropene is an alkene that has the most ring strain between the two mentioned. The differing hybridizations and geometries between cyclopropene and cyclopropane contribute to the increased ring strain. Cyclopropene also has an increased angle strain, which also contributes to the greater ring strain. However, this trend does not always work for every alkane and alkene.[8]

Torsional strain (Pitzer strain)

In some molecules, torsional strain can contribute to ring strain in addition to angle strain. One example of such a molecule is cyclopropane. Cyclopropane's carbon-carbon bonds form angles of 60°, far from the preferred angle of 109.5° angle in alkanes, so angle strain contributes most to cyclopropane's ring strain.[10] However, as shown in the Newman projection of the molecule, the hydrogen atoms are eclipsed, causing some torsional strain as well.[10]

Examples

In cycloalkanes, each carbon is bonded nonpolar covalently to two carbons and two hydrogen. The carbons have sp3 hybridization and should have ideal bond angles of 109.5°. Due to the limitations of cyclic structure, however, the ideal angle is only achieved in a six carbon ring — cyclohexane in chair conformation. For other cycloalkanes, the bond angles deviate from ideal.

Molecules with a high amount of ring strain consist of three, four, and some five-membered rings, including: cyclopropanes, cyclopropenes, cyclobutanes, cyclobutenes, [1,1,1]propellanes, [2,2,2]propellanes, epoxides, aziridines, cyclopentenes, and norbornenes. These molecules have bond angles between ring atoms which are more acute than the optimal tetrahedral (109.5°) and trigonal planar (120°) bond angles required by their respective sp3 and sp2 bonds. Because of the smaller bond angles, the bonds have higher energy and adopt more p-character to reduce the energy of the bonds. In addition, the ring structures of cyclopropanes/enes and cyclclobutanes/enes offer very little conformational flexibility. Thus, the substituents of ring atoms exist in an eclipsed conformation in cyclopropanes and between gauche and eclipsed in cyclobutanes, contributing to higher ring strain energy in the form of van der Waals repulsion.

monocycles

  • cyclopropane (29 kcal/mol), C3H6 — the C-C-C bond angles are 60° whereas tetrahedral 109.5° bond angles are expected.[7] The intense angle strain leads to nonlinear orbital overlap of its sp3 orbitals.[6] Because of the bond's instability, cyclopropane is more reactive than other alkanes.[6] Since any three points make a plane and cyclopropane has only three carbons, cyclopropane is planar.[7] The H-C-H bond angle is 115° whereas 106° is expected as in the CH2 groups of propane.[7]
  • cyclobutane (26.3 kcal/mol), C4H8 — if cyclobutane were completely square planar, its bond angles would be 90° whereas tetrahedral 109.5° bond angles are expected.[6] However, the actual C-C-C bond angle is 88° because it has a slightly folded form to relieve some torsional strain at the expense of slightly more angle strain.[6] The high strain energy of cyclobutane is primarily from angle strain.[7]
  • cyclopentane (7.4 kcal/mol), C5H10 — if it was a completely regular planar pentagon its bond angles would be 108°, but tetrahedral 109.5° bond angles are expected.[6] However, it has an unfixed puckered shape that undulates up and down.[6]
  • cyclohexane (1.3 kcal/mol), C6H12 — Although the chair conformation is able to achieve ideal angles, the unstable half-chair conformation has angle strain in the C-C-C angles which range from 109.86° to 119.07°.[11]

Bicyclics[12]

  • bicyclo[1.1.0]butane (66.3 kcal/mol), C4H6
  • bicyclo[1.2.0]pentane (54.7 kcal/mol), C5H8
  • [[bicyclo[1.3.0]hexane]] (26 kcal/mol), C6H10
  • norbornane (16.6 kcal/mol), C7H12

Ring strain can be considerably higher in bicyclic systems. For example, bicyclobutane, C4H6, is noted for being one of the most strained compounds that is isolatable on a large scale; its strain energy is estimated at 63.9 kcal mol−1 (267 kJ mol−1).[13][14]

Cyclopropane has a lesser amount of ring strain since it has the least amount of unsaturation; as a result, increasing the amount of unsaturation leads to greater ring strain.[8] For example, cyclopropene has a greater amount of ring strain than cyclopropane because it has more unsaturation.

Applications

The potential energy and unique bonding structure contained in the bonds of molecules with ring strain can be used to drive reactions in organic synthesis. Examples of such reactions are ring opening metathesis polymerisation, photo-induced ring opening of cyclobutenes, and nucleophilic ring-opening of epoxides and aziridines.

Increased potential energy from ring strain also can be used to increase the energy released by explosives or increase their shock sensitivity.[15] For example, the shock sensitivity of the explosive 1,3,3-Trinitroazetidine could partially or primarily explained by its ring strain.[15]

See also

References
  1. Smith, Michael B.; March, Jerry (2007), Advanced Organic Chemistry: Reactions, Mechanisms, and Structure (6th ed.), New York: Wiley-Interscience, ISBN 978-0-471-72091-1
  2. Wiberg, K. (1986). "The Concept of Strain in Organic Chemistry". Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 25 (4): 312–322. doi:10.1002/anie.198603121.
  3. Bachrach, Steven M. (1990-11-01). "The Group Equivalent Reaction. An Improved Method for Determining Ring Strain Energy". Journal of Chemical Education. 67 (11): 907. doi:10.1021/ed067p907.
  4. Dudev, Todor; Lim, Carmay (1998-05-01). "Ring Strain Energies from ab Initio Calculations". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 120 (18): 4450–4458. doi:10.1021/ja973895x. ISSN 0002-7863.
  5. "strain theory | chemistry | Britannica". www.britannica.com. Retrieved 2022-11-03.
  6. Wade, L. G. "Structure and Stereochemistry of Alkanes." Organic Chemistry. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2006. 103-122. Print.
  7. Anslyn, Eric V., and Dennis A. Dougherty. "Chapter 2: Strain and Stability." Modern Physical Organic Chemistry. Sausalito, CA: University Science, 2006. 100-09. Print.
  8. Gordon, Mark S. (1980-12-01). "Ring strain in cyclopropane, cyclopropene, silacyclopropane, and silacyclopropene". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 102 (25): 7419–7422. doi:10.1021/ja00545a002. ISSN 0002-7863.
  9. Solomons, T. W. Graham (1992). Organic Chemistry (5th ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. p. 316. ISBN 0-471-52544-8.
  10. Solomons, T. W. Graham (1992). Organic Chemistry (5th ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. p. 138. ISBN 0-471-52544-8.
  11. "Chair and half chair". Archived from the original on 2009-09-03.
  12. Khoury, P. R.; Goddard, J. D.; Tam, W. (2004). "Ring Strain Energies: Substituted Rings, Norbornanes, Norbornenes and Norbornadienes". Tetrahedron. 60: 8103– 8112.
  13. Wiberg, K. B. (1968). "Small Ring Bicyclo[n.m.0]alkanes". In Hart, H.; Karabatsos, G. J. (eds.). Advances in Alicyclic Chemistry. Vol. 2. Academic Press. pp. 185–254. ISBN 9781483224213.
  14. Wiberg, K. B.; Lampman, G. M.; Ciula, R. P.; Connor, D. S.; Schertler, P.; Lavanish, J. (1965). "Bicyclo[1.1.0]butane". Tetrahedron. 21 (10): 2749–2769. doi:10.1016/S0040-4020(01)98361-9.
  15. Tan, Bisheng; Long, Xinping; Li, Jinshan; Nie, Fude; Huang, Jinglun (2012-12-01). "Insight into shock-induced chemical reaction from the perspective of ring strain and rotation of chemical bonds". Journal of Molecular Modeling. 18 (12): 5127–5132. doi:10.1007/s00894-012-1516-y. ISSN 0948-5023. PMID 22777429. S2CID 34065895.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.