Chemoselectivity

Chemoselectivity is the preferential reaction of a chemical reagent with one of two or more different functional groups.[1]

In a chemoselective system, a reagent in the presence of an aldehyde and an ester would mostly target the aldehyde, even if it has the option to react with the ester. Chemoselectivity is an area of interest in chemistry because scientists want to recreate complex biological compounds, such as natural products, and make specific modifications to them.[2]

Most chemical reactions bring together atoms that have negative charge character and atoms that have positive charge character.[3] When evaluating possible reaction outcomes, several factors should be considered. The most important being identifying where in the molecule has the most electron density and where has the least.[3] This analysis gives a good prediction of reactivity, but more factors such as connectivity, atomic orbital overlap, solvent effects, and the addition of supporting reagents can affect the reaction outcome.  

Electrophilicity

Main page: electrophile

If a molecule has several potential reactive sites, the reaction will occur in the most reactive one. When comparing carbon-halogen bonds, lighter halogens such as fluorine and chlorine have a better orbital overlap with carbon, which makes the bond stronger.[4] Bromine and iodine, on the other hand, are bigger and therefore can undergo chemical reactions more easily.

Carbonyl functional groups

The reactivity of carbonyls can be ranked by evaluating how much electron density the neighbouring atoms donate to the carbonyl carbon.[3] Aldehydes are the most reactive because the hydrogen next to the carbon is small and only has one electron, and therefore does not provide steric or electronic shielding. By switching the hydrogen for a carbon group, making a ketone, the carbonyl becomes less reactive since the carbon is bigger and has more electrons. The most stable carbonyls are the ones with atoms with lone pairs next to them, such as amides and esters.[4] Since the electrons are not participating in bonding, they are not as restricted and can readily donate to the carbon. Amides are less reactive than esters because oxygen is more electronegative than nitrogen and therefore it concentrates more of the electron density on itself.[3] Chemists take advantage of the stability of amides by using them as protecting groups to shield sites that they don't want to react.[5]

Metal-assisted selectivity

Some reagents have higher affinity with specific functional groups, which can be used to direct reactivity. A famous example is the Luche Reduction, where an oxophilic metal makes the carbonyl of a conjugated ketone more reactive and directs the reducing agent.[6] On the other hand, copper organometallics have high affinity with carbon-carbon multiple bonds and are used for conjugate addition of nucleophiles into a conjugated ketone.[7]

Reducing and oxidizing reagents

Different hydride reagents have different reactivity towards functional groups so they can be selected according to the desired outcome.[8] Examples include the greater relative chemoselectivity of sodium borohydride versus lithium aluminium hydride for the organic reduction of 4-nitro-2-chlorobenzonitrile to the corresponding aniline, 4-amino-2-chlorobenzonitrile. In another example, the compound 4-methoxyacetophenone is oxidized by bleach at the ketone group at high pH (forming the carboxylic acid) and oxidized by EAS (to the aryl chloride) at low pH.[9]

See also

References
  1. "Chemoselectivity (chemoselective)". IUPAC Compendium of Chemical Terminology (3rd ed.). International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry. 2006. doi:10.1351/goldbook.C01051 – via Online version 3.0.1, 2019.
  2. Shenvi, Ryan A.; O’Malley, Daniel P.; Baran, Phil S. (2009-04-21). "Chemoselectivity: The Mother of Invention in Total Synthesis". Accounts of Chemical Research. 42 (4): 530–541. doi:10.1021/ar800182r. ISSN 0001-4842. PMC 2765532. PMID 19182997.
  3. Zumdahl, Steven S. (1995). Chemical Principles (2nd ed.). Lexinton, MA, USA: HEATH. ISBN 0669393215.
  4. Ouellette, Robert J.; Rawn, J. David (1996). Organic chemistry. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Prentice Hall. ISBN 978-0-02-390171-3.
  5. Greene, Theodora W.; Wuts, Peter G. M. (1999). Protective groups in organic synthesis. A Wiley-Interscience publication (3. ed.). New York Weinheim: Wiley. ISBN 978-0-471-16019-9.
  6. Gemal, Andre L.; Luche, Jean Louis (September 1981). "Lanthanoids in organic synthesis. 6. Reduction of .alpha.-enones by sodium borohydride in the presence of lanthanoid chlorides: synthetic and mechanistic aspects". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 103 (18): 5454–5459. doi:10.1021/ja00408a029. ISSN 0002-7863.
  7. Alexakis, A.; Bäckvall, J. E.; Krause, N.; Pàmies, O.; Diéguez, M. (2008-08-01). "Enantioselective Copper-Catalyzed Conjugate Addition and Allylic Substitution Reactions". Chemical Reviews. 108 (8): 2796–2823. doi:10.1021/cr0683515. ISSN 0009-2665. PMID 18671436.
  8. Walker, E. R. H. (1976). "The functional group selectivity of complex hydride reducing agents". Chemical Society Reviews. 5: 23. doi:10.1039/cs9760500023. ISSN 0306-0012.
  9. Ballard, C. Eric (2010-01-12). "pH-Controlled Oxidation of an Aromatic Ketone: Structural Elucidation of the Products of Two Green Chemical Reactions". Journal of Chemical Education. 87 (2): 190–193. Bibcode:2010JChEd..87..190B. doi:10.1021/ed800054s. ISSN 0021-9584.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.