Anion exchange membrane electrolysis
AEM electrolyzer working principle with HER and OER. | |
Materials | |
---|---|
Electrolysis type | AEM electrolysis |
Membrane | Solid polymer membrane |
Anode distributor | Nickel or titanium[1] |
Cathode distributor | Graphite or nickel[1] |
Anode catalyst | Nickel or iridium[1] |
Cathode catalyst | Platinum/carbon or nickel[1] |
Anode PTL | Nickel[1] |
Cathode PTL | Carbon[1] |
Electrolyte | KOH or pure water |
State-of-the-art performance | |
Current density | 1–2 A/cm2[2] |
Voltage | 1.5–1.9 V[2] |
Power density | 1.5–3.8 W/cm2[2] |
Temperature | 40–90 °C[2] |
Pressure | 1–30 bar[2] |
Specific H2 production | 0.25–1 Nm3/h[2] |
Current degradation rate | ~75 μV/h[3] |
Desired degradation rate | <1 μV/h[4][5] |
Current lifetime | ~2000 h[2] |
Desired lifetime | ~100,000 h[6] |
Current H2 purity | ~99.99%[2][6] |
Desired H2 purity | > 99.9999%[6] |
Anion exchange membrane (AEM) electrolysis is the electrolysis of water that utilises a semipermeable membrane that conducts hydroxide ions (OH−) called an anion exchange membrane. Like a proton-exchange membrane (PEM), the membrane separates the products, provides electrical insulation between electrodes, and conducts ions. Unlike PEM, AEM conducts hydroxide ions. AEM electrolysis is still in the early research and development stage, while alkaline water electrolysis is mature and PEM electrolysis is in the commercial stage. There is less academic literature on pure-water fed AEM electrolysers compared to the usage of KOH solution.[7] One advantage of AEM water electrolysis is that a high-cost noble metal catalyst is not required, low-cost transition metal catalyst can be used instead.[8][9] AEM electrolysis is similar to alkaline water electrolysis, which uses a non-ion-selective separator instead of an anion-exchange membrane.
Advantages and challenges
Advantages
Of all water electrolysis methods, AEM electrolysis can combine the advantages of alkaline water electrolysis (AWE) and PEM electrolysis.[10][11] Polymer electrolyte membrane electrolysis uses expensive platinum-group metals (PGMs) such as platinum, iridium, and ruthenium as a catalyst. Iridium, for instance, is more scarce than platinum; a 100 MW PEM electrolyser is expected to require 150 kg of Iridium, which will cost an estimated 7 million USD.[12] Like alkaline water electrolysis, electrodes in AEM electrolysis operate in an alkaline environment, which allows non-noble, low-cost catalysts based on Ni, Fe, Co, Mn, Cu, etc to be used.[8][10][11][13][14]
AEM electrolyser can run on pure water or slightly alkaline solutions (0.1-1M KOH/NaOH) unlike highly concentrated alkaline solutions (5M KOH/NaOH) in AWE.[10][15] This reduces the risk of leakage.[10] Using an alkaline solution, usually KOH/NaOH increases membrane conductivity and adds a hydroxide ion conductive pathway, which increases the utilisation of catalyst. The current density of an AEM electrolyser without a PGM catalyst operating at 1 A/cm2 was reported to require 1.8 volts and 1.57 volts in pure water-fed and 1 M KOH-fed, respectively.[16] Electrolyte can be fed on both anode and cathode side or anode side only.[17]
In the zero-gap design of AWE, the electrodes are separated only by a diaphragm which separates the gases. The diaphragm only allows water and hydroxide ions to pass through, but does not completely eliminate gas cross-over. Oxygen gas can enter the hydrogen half-cell and react on the cathode side to form water, which reduces the efficiency of the cell. Gas cross-over from the H2 to the O2 evolution side can pose a safety hazard because it can create an explosive gas mixture with >4%mol H2.[15][7] The AEM electrolyser was reported to maintain H2 crossover to less than 0.4% for the 5000 h of operation.[18]
AEM based on an aromatic polymer backbone is promising due to its significant cost reduction. Compare to Nafion membrane use in PEM, the production of Nafion required highly toxic chemicals, which increased the cost (>1000$/m2)[19][20] and fluorocarbon gas is produced at the production stage of tetrafluoroethylene, which poses a strong environmental impact.[21] Fluorinated raw materials are inessential for AEM, allowing for a wider selection of low-cost polymer chemistry.[9]
Challenges
The major technical challenge facing a consumer level AEM electrolyser is the short device lifetime or longevity. The lifetimes of PEM electrolyser stacks range from 20,000 h to 80,000 h.[16][15] Literature surveys have found that AEM electrolyser durability is demonstrated to be >2000 h, >12,000 h, and >700 h for pure water-fed (Pt group catalyst on anode and cathode), concentrated KOH-fed, and 1wt% K2CO3-fed respectively.[16]
In particular, many AEM breakdown at temperatures higher than 60 °C, AEM that can tolerate the presence of O2, high pH, and temperatures exceeding 60 °C are needed.[23][24]
Science
Reactions
The Oxygen Evolution Reaction (OER) involves complex processes and a high energy barrier and thus a high overpotential. The performance of the AEM electrolyser largely depends on OER. The overpotential of OER can be lowered with a suitable catalyst. Researches shows that Ni-Fe based catalysts are one of the most promising catalysts for OER in AEM electrolyser. [25]
Hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) kinetics in alkaline solutions is usually faster.[23][10]
Anode reaction
Where the * indicate species adsorbed to the surface of the catalyst.
Cathode reaction
The reaction starts with water adsorption and dissociation in Volmer step and either hydrogen desorption in the Tafel step or Heyrovsky step.
Volmer step: |
Tafel step: |
Heyrovsky step: |
Catalysts
Both the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) and the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) are characterized by sluggish kinetics, thus requiring the use of highly active catalysts.[27] High performance is typically achieved with the benchmark combination of iridium oxide (IrOx) for the anodic OER and platinum on carbon (Pt/C) for the cathodic HER, due to their high intrinsic activity.[28]
However, the alkaline environment of AEM electrolyzers allows the use of non-platinum-group metal (non-PGM) catalysts, such as transition metal oxides of nickel (Ni), cobalt (Co), iron (Fe), and copper (Cu) for the OER, and nickel- or molybdenum-based materials for the HER. While these alternatives are economically favorable, they generally show lower intrinsic activity. Operating in a highly alkaline electrolyte (pH = 14 with 1 M KOH) and optimizing electrode structure are therefore crucial to achieving good efficiency and performance.[29]
Although the Pt/C catalyst deposited on a porous transport layer (PTL) made of carbon paper currently demonstrates good HER performance, research is increasingly focusing on nickel (Ni) or nickel-iron (NiFe) catalysts in order to reduce costs and environmental impact.[30][31] The catalyst is generally applied to the cathode by spray-coating, since the carbon paper offers a relatively smooth and flat surface, controlled porosity, and good adhesion of the materials.[31]
Spray-coating is not suitable for the anode, since the highly porous and irregular surface of the nickel metal felt (commonly used as the anodic PTL) does not allow for the formation of a thin and uniform catalyst layer, making thickness and distribution difficult to control. Therefore, the most common deposition methods for the anode are immersion, impregnation, or electrodeposition.[32] The objective of the deposition process is to maximize the ratio of electrochemical active surface area to the amount of catalyst employed.
The use of iridium oxide (IrOx) as an anodic catalyst, as in PEM electrolyzers, is not necessary here: the alkaline environment enables good reaction activity with more affordable materials such as nickel oxides (NiOx) and nickel-iron (NiFe).[33][34] The porosity of the electrode and PTL is key to effectively managing the oxygen bubbles formed during the reaction.[35] Poor oxygen bubble removal can severely hinder performance, as hydroxide ions cannot reach the active sites of the anodic catalyst.[36] Operation with potassium hydroxide (KOH) can improve not only the membrane ionic conductivity but also the electrode performance.[37] Bubble detachment from active sites occurs at smaller sizes when using KOH, which promotes more effective gas evacuation and improved contact between the electrolyte and the catalyst's active surface.
Anion exchange membrane
Hydroxide ion intrinsically has lower mobility than H+, increasing ion exchange capacity can compensate for this lower mobility but also increase swelling and reduce membrane mechanical stability. Cross-linking membranes can compensate for membrane mechanical instability. The quaternary ammonium (QA) headgroup is commonly employed to attach polymer matrices in AEM. The head group allows anions but not cations to be transported. QA AEMs have low chemical stability because they are susceptible to OH− attack. Promising head group candidates include imidazolium-based head group and nitrogen-free head groups such as phosphonium, sulphonium, and ligand-metal complex. Most QAs and imidazolium groups degrade in alkaline environments by Hofmann degradation, SN2 reaction, or ring-opening reaction, especially at high temperatures and pH.[23][38]
Polymeric AEM backbones are cationic-free base polymers. Poly(arylene ether)-based backbones, polyolefin-based backbones, polyphenylene-based backbones, and backbones containing cationic moieties are some examples.[23]
Some of the best-performing AEMs are HTMA-DAPP, QPC-TMA, m-PBI, and PFTP.[21]
Membrane electrode assembly
A membrane electrode assembly (MEA) is made of an anode and cathode catalyst layer with a membrane layer in between. The catalyst layer can be deposited on the membrane or the substrate. Catalyst-coated substrate (CCS) and catalyst-coated membrane (CCM) are two approaches to preparing MEA. A substrate must conduct electricity, support the catalyst mechanically, and remove gaseous products.
Nickel is typically used as a substrate for AEM, while titanium is for PEM; both nickel and titanium can be used on AEM. Carbon materials are not suitable for the anode side because of their degradation by HO− ions, which are nucleophiles.[7] On the cathode, nickel, titanium, and carbon can be readily used. The catalyst layer is typically made by mixing catalyst powder and ionomer to produce an ink or slurry that is applied by spraying or painting. [23][7] Other methods include electrodeposition, magnetron sputtering, chemical electroless plating, and screen printing onto the substrate.[7][39]
Ionomers act as a binder for the catalyst, substrate support, and membrane, which also provide OH− conducting ions and increase electrocatalytic activities.[11][23][7]
See also
- Electrochemistry
- Electrochemical engineering
- Electrolysis
- Hydrogen production
- Photocatalytic water splitting
- Timeline of hydrogen technologies
- Electrolysis of water
- PEM fuel cell
- proton-exchange membrane
- Hydrogen economy
- High-pressure electrolysis
References
- ^ a b c d e f Volk, Emily K.; Kreider, Melissa E.; Kwon, Stephanie (2024). "Recent progress in understanding the catalyst layer in anion exchange membrane electrolyzers – durability, utilization, and integration". EES Catalysis. 2 (1): 109–137. doi:10.1039/D3EY00193H. Retrieved 2025-07-08.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Mulk, Waqad Ul; Aziz, A. Rashid A.; Ismael, Mhadi A. (2024). "Electrochemical hydrogen production through anion exchange membrane water electrolysis (AEMWE): Recent progress and associated challenges in hydrogen production". International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 94: 1174–1211. Bibcode:2024IJHE...94.1174M. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.11.143. Retrieved 2025-07-08.
- ^ Shen, Haifeng; Gao, Fei-Yue; Li, Haobo (2025). "Durable Anion Exchange Membrane Water Electrolysis in Low-Alkaline Concentration Electrolyte". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 147 (26): 22677–22685. doi:10.1021/jacs.5c04194. PMID 40548956. Retrieved 2025-07-08.
- ^ Motealleh, Behrooz; Liu, Zengcai; Masel, Rich I. (2021). "Next-generation anion exchange membrane water electrolyzers operating for commercially relevant lifetimes". International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 46 (5): 3379–3386. Bibcode:2021IJHE...46.3379M. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.244. Retrieved 2025-07-08.
- ^ Myeong, Shin-Woo; Jeong, Jaehoon; Jeong, Jae-yeop (2024). "Highly durable and efficient anion exchange membrane water electrolyzer using one-step fabrication of the integrated electrode by the hot-press process". Applied Energy. 371 123650. Bibcode:2024ApEn..37123650M. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123650. Retrieved 2025-07-08.
- ^ a b c Shaik, Shajahan; Kundu, Joyjit; Yuan, Yuliang (2024). "Recent Progress and Perspective in Pure Water-Fed Anion Exchange Membrane Water Electrolyzers". Advanced Energy Materials. 14 (35): 2401956. Bibcode:2024AdEnM..1401956S. doi:10.1002/aenm.202401956. Retrieved 2025-07-08.
- ^ a b c d e f Miller, Hamish Andrew; Bouzek, Karel; Hnat, Jaromir; Loos, Stefan; Bernäcker, Christian Immanuel; Weißgärber, Thomas; Röntzsch, Lars; Meier-Haack, Jochen (2020). "Green hydrogen from anion exchange membrane water electrolysis: a review of recent developments in critical materials and operating conditions". Sustainable Energy & Fuels. 4 (5): 2114–2133. doi:10.1039/c9se01240k.
- ^ a b Varcoe, John R.; Atanassov, Plamen; Dekel, Dario R.; Herring, Andrew M.; Hickner, Michael A.; Kohl, Paul. A.; Kucernak, Anthony R.; Mustain, William E.; Nijmeijer, Kitty; Scott, Keith; Xu, Tongwen; Zhuang, Lin (2014). "Anion-exchange membranes in electrochemical energy systems". Energy Environ. Sci. 7 (10): 3135–3191. Bibcode:2014EnEnS...7.3135V. doi:10.1039/C4EE01303D. hdl:10044/1/24509.
- ^ a b Dekel, Dario R. (January 2018). "Review of cell performance in anion exchange membrane fuel cells". Journal of Power Sources. 375: 158–169. Bibcode:2018JPS...375..158D. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.07.117.
- ^ a b c d e Yang, Juchan; Jang, Myeong Je; Zeng, Xiaojun; Park, Yoo Sei; Lee, Jooyoung; Choi, Sung Mook; Yin, Yadong (October 2021). "Non-precious electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reaction in anion exchange membrane water electrolysis: A mini review". Electrochemistry Communications. 131 107118. doi:10.1016/j.elecom.2021.107118.
- ^ a b c Shirvanian, Paige; Loh, Adeline; Sluijter, Soraya; Li, Xiaohong (November 2021). "Novel components in anion exchange membrane water electrolyzers (AEMWE's): Status, challenges and future needs. A mini review". Electrochemistry Communications. 132 107140. doi:10.1016/j.elecom.2021.107140. hdl:10871/127974. S2CID 240613300.
- ^ Henkensmeier, Dirk; Najibah, Malikah; Harms, Corinna; Žitka, Jan; Hnát, Jaromír; Bouzek, Karel (1 May 2021). "Overview: State-of-the Art Commercial Membranes for Anion Exchange Membrane Water Electrolysis". Journal of Electrochemical Energy Conversion and Storage. 18 (2). doi:10.1115/1.4047963.
- ^ Xu, Qiucheng; Zhang, Liyue; Zhang, Jiahao; Wang, Jingyu; Hu, Yanjie; Jiang, Hao; Li, Chunzhong (September 2022). "Anion Exchange Membrane Water Electrolyzer: Electrode Design, Lab-Scaled Testing System and Performance Evaluation" (PDF). EnergyChem. 4 (5): 100087. Bibcode:2022EnCh....400087X. doi:10.1016/j.enchem.2022.100087. S2CID 251354531.
- ^ Lindquist, Grace A.; Xu, Qiucheng; Oener, Sebastian Z.; Boettcher, Shannon W. (December 2020). "Membrane Electrolyzers for Impure-Water Splitting". Joule. 4 (12): 2549–2561. Bibcode:2020Joule...4.2549L. doi:10.1016/j.joule.2020.09.020.
- ^ a b c Shiva Kumar, S.; Lim, Hankwon (November 2022). "An overview of water electrolysis technologies for green hydrogen production". Energy Reports. 8: 13793–13813. Bibcode:2022EnRep...813793S. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2022.10.127.
- ^ a b c Li, Dongguo; Motz, Andrew R.; Bae, Chulsung; Fujimoto, Cy; Yang, Gaoqiang; Zhang, Feng-Yuan; Ayers, Katherine E.; Kim, Yu Seung (2021). "Durability of anion exchange membrane water electrolyzers". Energy & Environmental Science. 14 (6): 3393–3419. Bibcode:2021EnEnS..14.3393L. doi:10.1039/d0ee04086j.
- ^ Xu, Dongyu; Stevens, Michaela Burke; Cosby, Monty R.; Oener, Sebastian Z.; Smith, Adam M.; Enman, Lisa J.; Ayers, Katherine E.; Capuano, Christopher B.; Renner, Julie N.; Danilovic, Nemanja; Li, Yaogang; Wang, Hongzhi; Zhang, Qinghong; Boettcher, Shannon W. (4 January 2019). "Earth-Abundant Oxygen Electrocatalysts for Alkaline Anion-Exchange-Membrane Water Electrolysis: Effects of Catalyst Conductivity and Comparison with Performance in Three-Electrode Cells". ACS Catalysis. 9 (1): 7–15. doi:10.1021/acscatal.8b04001. S2CID 105391723.
- ^ Moreno-González, Marta; Mardle, Peter; Zhu, Shan; Gholamkhass, Bobak; Jones, Scot; Chen, Nathan; Britton, Benjamin; Holdcroft, Steven (January 2023). "One year operation of an anion exchange membrane water electrolyzer utilizing Aemion+ membrane: Minimal degradation, low H2 crossover and high efficiency". Journal of Power Sources Advances. 19 100109. doi:10.1016/j.powera.2023.100109.
- ^ Mamlouk, Mohamed (2022). "Alkaline Anion Exchange Membrane (AEM) Water Electrolysers—Current/Future Perspectives in Electrolysers for Hydrogen". Comprehensive Renewable Energy: 473–504. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-819727-1.00103-5. ISBN 9780128197349. S2CID 239231605.
- ^ Khomein, Piyachai; Ketelaars, Wesley; Lap, Tijs; Liu, Gao (March 2021). "Sulfonated aromatic polymer as a future proton exchange membrane: A review of sulfonation and crosslinking methods". Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 137 110471. Bibcode:2021RSERv.13710471K. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.110471. S2CID 228845451.
- ^ a b Santoro, Carlo; Lavacchi, Alessandro; Mustarelli, Piercarlo; Di Noto, Vito; Elbaz, Lior; Dekel, Dario R.; Jaouen, Frédéric (22 April 2022). "What is Next in Anion-Exchange Membrane Water Electrolyzers? Bottlenecks, Benefits, and Future". ChemSusChem. 15 (8): e202200027. Bibcode:2022ChSCh..15E0027S. doi:10.1002/cssc.202200027. hdl:10281/380104. PMC 9310600. PMID 35263034.
- ^ Najibah, Malikah; Tsoy, Ekaterina; Khalid, Hamza; Chen, Yongfang; Li, Qingfeng; Bae, Chulsung; Hnát, Jaromír; Plevová, Michaela; Bouzek, Karel; Jang, Jong Hyun; Park, Hyun S.; Henkensmeier, Dirk (December 2021). "PBI nanofiber mat-reinforced anion exchange membranes with covalently linked interfaces for use in water electrolysers". Journal of Membrane Science. 640 119832. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2021.119832. S2CID 239639812.
- ^ a b c d e f Du, Naiying; Roy, Claudie; Peach, Retha; Turnbull, Matthew; Thiele, Simon; Bock, Christina (13 July 2022). "Anion-Exchange Membrane Water Electrolyzers". Chemical Reviews. 122 (13): 11830–11895. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00854. PMC 9284563. PMID 35442645.
- ^ Chand, Kishore; Paladino, Ombretta (February 2023). "Recent developments of membranes and electrocatalysts for the hydrogen production by anion exchange membrane water electrolysers: A review". Arabian Journal of Chemistry. 16 (2): 104451. doi:10.1016/j.arabjc.2022.104451. hdl:11567/1101845. S2CID 254002110.
- ^ Kumar, S. Shiva; Lim, Hankwon (25 October 2022). "An overview of water electrolysis technologies for green hydrogen production". Energy Reports. 8: 13793–13813. Bibcode:2022EnRep...813793S. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2022.10.127.
- ^ Mayerhöfer, Britta; Speck, Florian D.; Hegelheimer, Manuel (2022). "Electrochemical- and mechanical stability of catalyst layers in anion exchange membrane water electrolysis". International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 47 (7): 4304–4314. Bibcode:2022IJHE...47.4304M. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.11.083. Retrieved 2025-07-10.
- ^ Cossar, Emily; Oyarce Barnett, Alejandro; Seland, Frode (2019). "The Performance of Nickel and Nickel-Iron Catalysts Evaluated As Anodes in Anion Exchange Membrane Water Electrolysis". Catalysts. 9 (10): 814. doi:10.3390/catal9100814. hdl:11250/2634392.
- ^ Shirwalkar, Advay; Kaur, Manjodh; Zhong, Sichen (2025). "Comparing Intrinsic Catalytic Activity and Practical Performance of Ni- and Pt-Based Alkaline Anion Exchange Membrane Water Electrolyzer Cathodes". ACS Energy Letters. 10 (4): 1779–1785. doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.5c00439. PMC 11998071. Retrieved 2025-07-09.
- ^ Shen, Haifeng; Gao, Fei-Yue; Li, Haobo (2025). "Durable Anion Exchange Membrane Water Electrolysis in Low-Alkaline Concentration Electrolyte". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 147 (26): 22677–22685. doi:10.1021/jacs.5c04194. Retrieved 2025-07-09.
- ^ Pushkarev, Artem S.; Pushkareva, Irina V.; du Preez, Stephanus P. (2023). "PGM-Free Electrocatalytic Layer Characterization by Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy of an Anion Exchange Membrane Water Electrolyzer with Nafion Ionomer as the Bonding Agent". Catalysts. 13 (3): 554. doi:10.3390/catal13030554.
- ^ a b Yang, Ning; Li, Haonan; Lin, Xiao (2025). "Catalytic electrode comprising a gas diffusion layer and bubble-involved mass transfer in anion exchange membrane water electrolysis: A critical review and perspectives". Journal of Energy Chemistry. 105: 669–701. Bibcode:2025JEnCh.105..669Y. doi:10.1016/j.jechem.2024.12.073. Retrieved 2025-07-09.
- ^ Wan, Lei; Liu, Jing; Xu, Ziang (2022). "Construction of Integrated Electrodes with Transport Highways for Pure-Water-Fed Anion Exchange Membrane Water Electrolysis". Small. 18 (21). doi:10.1002/smll.202200380. Retrieved 2025-07-09.
- ^ Pushkareva, Irina V.; Wu, Zhixing; Liu, Xianjie (2025). "Advanced Nickel-Based Gas Diffusion Anode for Zero-Gap Anion-Exchange Membrane Water Electrolyzers". ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 17 (22): 32216–32227. doi:10.1021/acsami.5c01272. PMC 12147071. Retrieved 2025-07-09.
- ^ Mirizzi, Lorenzo; Muhyuddin, Mohsin; Lo Vecchio, Carmelo (2025). "Amorphous nanostructured Ni–Fe oxide as a notably active and low-cost oxygen evolution reaction electrocatalyst for anion exchange membrane water electrolysis". Industrial Chemistry & Materials. doi:10.1039/D5IM00008D. hdl:10281/560102. Retrieved 2025-07-10.
- ^ Kreider, Melissa E.; Yu, Haoran; Osmieri, Luigi (2024). "Understanding the Effects of Anode Catalyst Conductivity and Loading on Catalyst Layer Utilization and Performance for Anion Exchange Membrane Water Electrolysis". ACS Catalysis. 14 (14): 10806–10819. doi:10.1021/acscatal.4c02932. PMC 11264204. Retrieved 2025-07-09.
- ^ Lawand, Khaled; Nuggehalli Sampathkumar, Suhas; Mury, Zoé (2024). "Membrane electrode assembly simulation of anion exchange membrane water electrolysis". Journal of Power Sources. 595 234047. Bibcode:2024JPS...59534047L. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.234047. Retrieved 2025-07-09.
- ^ Stanislaw, Lauren N.; Gerhardt, Michael R.; Weber, Adam Z. (2019). "Modeling Electrolyte Composition Effects on Anion-Exchange-Membrane Water Electrolyzer Performance". ECS Transactions. 92 (8): 767–779. doi:10.1149/09208.0767ecst. Retrieved 2025-07-09.
- ^ Hagesteijn, Kimberly F. L.; Jiang, Shanxue; Ladewig, Bradley P. (August 2018). "A review of the synthesis and characterization of anion exchange membranes". Journal of Materials Science. 53 (16): 11131–11150. Bibcode:2018JMatS..5311131H. doi:10.1007/s10853-018-2409-y. hdl:10044/1/60973. S2CID 139833074.
- ^ López-Fernández, Ester; Sacedón, Celia Gómez; Gil-Rostra, Jorge; Yubero, Francisco; González-Elipe, Agustín R.; de Lucas-Consuegra, Antonio (20 October 2021). "Recent Advances in Alkaline Exchange Membrane Water Electrolysis and Electrode Manufacturing". Molecules. 26 (21): 6326. doi:10.3390/molecules26216326. hdl:10261/256196. PMC 8587517. PMID 34770735.
Further readings
- Volk, Emily K. (2024). "Recent progress in understanding the catalyst layer in anion exchange membrane electrolyzers – durability, utilization, and integration". EES Catalysis. 2: 109–137. doi:10.1039/D3EY00193H.
- Mulk, Waqad Ul (2024). "Electrochemical hydrogen production through anion exchange membrane water electrolysis (AEMWE): Recent progress and associated challenges in hydrogen production". International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 94: 1174–1211. Bibcode:2024IJHE...94.1174M. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.11.143.
- Yang, Ning (2025). "Catalytic electrode comprising a gas diffusion layer and bubble-involved mass transfer in anion exchange membrane water electrolysis: A critical review and perspectives". Journal of Energy Chemistry. 105: 669–701. Bibcode:2025JEnCh.105..669Y. doi:10.1016/j.jechem.2024.12.073.