Basis set superposition error

In quantum chemistry, calculations using finite basis sets are susceptible to basis set superposition error (BSSE). As the atoms of interacting molecules (or of different parts of the same molecule - intramolecular BSSE)[1][2] approach one another, their basis functions overlap. Each monomer "borrows" functions from other nearby components, effectively increasing its basis set and improving the calculation of derived properties such as energy.[3] If the total energy is minimised as a function of the system geometry, the short-range energies from the mixed basis sets must be compared with the long-range energies from the unmixed sets, and this mismatch introduces an error.

Other than using infinite basis sets, two methods exist to eliminate the BSSE. In the chemical Hamiltonian approach (CHA),[4][5] basis set mixing is prevented a priori, by replacing the conventional Hamiltonian with one in which all the projector-containing terms that would allow mixing have been removed. In the counterpoise method (CP),[6][7][8] the BSSE is calculated by re-performing all the calculations using the mixed basis sets, and the error is then subtracted a posteriori from the uncorrected energy. (The mixed basis sets are realised by introducing "ghost orbitals", basis set functions which have no electrons or protons.[2] It however has been shown that there is an inherent danger in using counterpoise corrected energy surfaces, due to the inconsistent effect of the correction in different areas of the energy surface.[3]) Though conceptually very different, the two methods tend to give similar results.[9] It also has been shown that the error is often larger when using the CP method since the central atoms in the system have much greater freedom to mix with all of the available functions compared to the outer atoms. Whereas in the CHA model, those orbitals have no greater intrinsic freedom and therefore the correction treats all fragments equally.[10] The errors inherent in either BSSE correction disappear more rapidly than the total value of BSSE in larger basis sets.[11]

See also

References
  1. Balabin, Roman M. (2008). "Enthalpy difference between conformations of normal alkanes: Intramolecular basis set superposition error (BSSE) in the case of n-butane and n-hexane". J. Chem. Phys. 129 (16): 164101. Bibcode:2008JChPh.129p4101B. doi:10.1063/1.2997349. PMID 19045241.
  2. Hobza, Pavel; Müller-Dethlefs, Klaus (2010). Non-covalent Interactions: Theory and Experiment (PDF). Cambridge, England: Royal Society of Chemistry. p. 13. ISBN 978-1-84755-853-4. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-06-06. Retrieved 2010-05-21.
  3. Liedl, Klaus R. (1998). "Dangers of counterpoise corrected hypersurfaces. Advantages of basis set superposition improvement". The Journal of Chemical Physics. 108 (8): 3199–3204. Bibcode:1998JChPh.108.3199L. doi:10.1063/1.475715.
  4. Mayer, I.; Valiron, P. (1998). "Second order Møller–Plesset perturbation theory without basis set superposition error". J. Chem. Phys. 109 (9): 3360–3373. Bibcode:1998JChPh.109.3360M. doi:10.1063/1.476931.
  5. Bende, Attila. "THE CHEMICAL HAMILTONIAN APPROACH (CHA)". Archived from the original on 6 March 2012. Retrieved 14 May 2010.
  6. Van Duijneveldt, Frans B.; van Duijneveldt-van de Rijdt, Jeanne G. C. M.; van Lenthe, Joop H. (1994). "State of the art in counterpoise theory". Chem. Rev. 94 (7): 1873–1885. doi:10.1021/cr00031a007.
  7. Rösch, N. (2003). "Counterpoise Correction". Technical University of Munich, Quantum Chemistry Laboratory. Archived from the original on 18 April 2015. Retrieved 14 May 2010.
  8. Sedano, Pedro Salvador (2000). "Counterpoise Corrected Potential Energy Surfaces". University of Girona. Retrieved 14 May 2010.
  9. Paizs, Béla; Suhai, Sándor (1998). "Comparative study of BSSE correction methods at DFT and MP2 levels of theory". J. Comput. Chem. 19 (6): 575–584. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(19980430)19:6<575::AID-JCC1>3.0.CO;2-O.
  10. Mentel, Lukasz; Baerends, Evert Jan (2013). "Can the Counterpoise Correction for Basis Set Superposition Effect Be Justified?". J. Comput. Chem. 10 (1): 252–267. doi:10.1021/ct400990u. PMID 26579908.
  11. Mayer, I. (2004). "Interrelations between the a priori and a posteriori BSSE correction schemes". Int. J. Quantum Chem. 100 (4): 559–566. doi:10.1002/qua.10827.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.