Mass diffusivity
Diffusivity, mass diffusivity or diffusion coefficient is usually written as the proportionality constant between the molar flux due to molecular diffusion and the negative value of the gradient in the concentration of the species. More accurately, the diffusion coefficient times the local concentration is the proportionality constant between the negative value of the mole fraction gradient and the molar flux. This distinction is especially significant in gaseous systems with strong temperature gradients. Diffusivity derives its definition from Fick's law and plays a role in numerous other equations of physical chemistry.
The diffusivity is generally prescribed for a given pair of species and pairwise for a multi-species system. The higher the diffusivity (of one substance with respect to another), the faster they diffuse into each other. Typically, a compound's diffusion coefficient is ~10,000× as great in air as in water. Carbon dioxide in air has a diffusion coefficient of 16 mm2/s, and in water its diffusion coefficient is 0.0016 mm2/s.[1][2]
Diffusivity has dimensions of length2 / time, or m2/s in SI units and cm2/s in CGS units.
Temperature dependence of the diffusion coefficient
Solids
The diffusion coefficient in solids at different temperatures is generally found to be well predicted by the Arrhenius equation:
where
- D is the diffusion coefficient (in m2/s),
- D0 is the maximal diffusion coefficient (at infinite temperature; in m2/s),
- EA is the activation energy for diffusion (in J/mol),
- T is the absolute temperature (in K),
- R ≈ 8.31446 J/(mol⋅K) is the universal gas constant.
Diffusion in crystalline solids, termed lattice diffusion, is commonly regarded to occur by two distinct mechanisms,[3] interstitial and substitutional or vacancy diffusion. The former mechanism describes diffusion as the motion of the diffusing atoms between interstitial sites in the lattice of the solid it is diffusion into, the latter describes diffusion through a mechanism more analogue to that in liquids or gases: Any crystal at nonzero temperature will have a certain number of vacancy defects (i.e. empty sites on the lattice) due to the random vibrations of atoms on the lattice, an atom neighbouring a vacancy can spontaneously "jump" into the vacancy, such that the vacancy appears to move. By this process the atoms in the solid can move, and diffuse into each other. Of the two mechanisms, interstitial diffusion is typically more rapid.[3]
Liquids
An approximate dependence of the diffusion coefficient on temperature in liquids can often be found using Stokes–Einstein equation, which predicts that
where
- D is the diffusion coefficient,
- T1 and T2 are the corresponding absolute temperatures,
- μ is the dynamic viscosity of the solvent.
Gases
The dependence of the diffusion coefficient on temperature for gases can be expressed using Chapman–Enskog theory (predictions accurate on average to about 8%):[4]
where
- D is the diffusion coefficient (cm2/s),[4][5]
- A is approximately (with Boltzmann constant , and Avogadro constant )
- 1 and 2 index the two kinds of molecules present in the gaseous mixture,
- T is the absolute temperature (K),
- M is the molar mass (g/mol),
- p is the pressure (atm),
- is the average collision diameter (the values are tabulated[6] page 545) (Å),
- Ω is a temperature-dependent collision integral (the values tabulated for some intermolecular potentials,[6] can be computed from correlations for others,[7] or must be evaluated numerically.) (dimensionless).
The relation
is obtained when inserting the ideal gas law into the expression obtained directly from Chapman-Enskog theory,[8] which may be written as
where is the molar density (mol / m) of the gas, and
,
with the universal gas constant. At moderate densities (i.e. densities at which the gas has a non-negligible co-volume, but is still sufficiently dilute to be considered as gas-like rather than liquid-like) this simple relation no longer holds, and one must resort to Revised Enskog Theory.[9] Revised Enskog Theory predicts a diffusion coefficient that decreases somewhat more rapidly with density, and which to a first approximation may be written as
where is the radial distribution function evaluated at the contact diameter of the particles. For molecules behaving like hard, elastic spheres, this value can be computed from the Carnahan-Starling Equation, while for more realistic intermolecular potentials such as the Mie potential or Lennard-Jones potential, its computation is more complex, and may involve invoking a thermodynamic perturbation theory, such as SAFT.
Pressure dependence of the diffusion coefficient
For self-diffusion in gases at two different pressures (but the same temperature), the following empirical equation has been suggested:[4]
where
- D is the diffusion coefficient,
- ρ is the gas mass density,
- P1 and P2 are the corresponding pressures.
Population dynamics: dependence of the diffusion coefficient on fitness
In population dynamics, kinesis is the change of the diffusion coefficient in response to the change of conditions. In models of purposeful kinesis, diffusion coefficient depends on fitness (or reproduction coefficient) r:
where is constant and r depends on population densities and abiotic characteristics of the living conditions. This dependence is a formalisation of the simple rule: Animals stay longer in good conditions and leave quicker bad conditions (the "Let well enough alone" model).
Effective diffusivity in porous media
The effective diffusion coefficient describes diffusion through the pore space of porous media.[10] It is macroscopic in nature, because it is not individual pores but the entire pore space that needs to be considered. The effective diffusion coefficient for transport through the pores, De, is estimated as follows:
where
- D is the diffusion coefficient in gas or liquid filling the pores,
- εt is the porosity available for the transport (dimensionless),
- δ is the constrictivity (dimensionless),
- τ is the tortuosity (dimensionless).
The transport-available porosity equals the total porosity less the pores which, due to their size, are not accessible to the diffusing particles, and less dead-end and blind pores (i.e., pores without being connected to the rest of the pore system). The constrictivity describes the slowing down of diffusion by increasing the viscosity in narrow pores as a result of greater proximity to the average pore wall. It is a function of pore diameter and the size of the diffusing particles.
Example values
Gases at 1 atm., solutes in liquid at infinite dilution. Legend: (s) – solid; (l) – liquid; (g) – gas; (dis) – dissolved.
Species pair | Temperature (°C) |
D (cm2/s) | |
---|---|---|---|
Solute | Solvent | ||
Water (g) | Air (g) | 25 | 0.260 |
Oxygen (g) | Air (g) | 25 | 0.176 |
Species pair | Temperature (°C) |
D (cm2/s) | |
---|---|---|---|
Solute | Solvent | ||
Acetone (dis) | Water (l) | 25 | 1.16×10−5 |
Air (dis) | Water (l) | 25 | 2.00×10−5 |
Ammonia (dis) | Water (l) | 12 | 1.64×10−5 |
Argon (dis) | Water (l) | 25 | 2.00×10−5 |
Benzene (dis) | Water (l) | 25 | 1.02×10−5 |
Bromine (dis) | Water (l) | 25 | 1.18×10−5 |
Carbon monoxide (dis) | Water (l) | 25 | 2.03×10−5 |
Carbon dioxide (dis) | Water (l) | 25 | 1.92×10−5 |
Chlorine (dis) | Water (l) | 25 | 1.25×10−5 |
Ethane (dis) | Water (l) | 25 | 1.20×10−5 |
Ethanol (dis) | Water (l) | 25 | 0.84×10−5 |
Ethylene (dis) | Water (l) | 25 | 1.87×10−5 |
Helium (dis) | Water (l) | 25 | 6.28×10−5 |
Hydrogen (dis) | Water (l) | 25 | 4.50×10−5 |
Hydrogen sulfide (dis) | Water (l) | 25 | 1.41×10−5 |
Methane (dis) | Water (l) | 25 | 1.49×10−5 |
Methanol (dis) | Water (l) | 25 | 0.84×10−5 |
Nitrogen (dis) | Water (l) | 25 | 1.88×10−5 |
Nitric oxide (dis) | Water (l) | 25 | 2.60×10−5 |
Oxygen (dis) | Water (l) | 25 | 2.10×10−5 |
Propane (dis) | Water (l) | 25 | 0.97×10−5 |
Water (l) | Acetone (l) | 25 | 4.56×10−5 |
Water (l) | Ethyl alcohol (l) | 25 | 1.24×10−5 |
Water (l) | Ethyl acetate (l) | 25 | 3.20×10−5 |
Species pair | Temperature (°C) |
D (cm2/s) | |
---|---|---|---|
Solute | Solvent | ||
Hydrogen | Iron (s) | 10 | 1.66×10−9 |
Hydrogen | Iron (s) | 100 | 124×10−9 |
Aluminium | Copper (s) | 20 | 1.3×10−30 |
See also
- Atomic diffusion
- Effective diffusion coefficient
- Lattice diffusion coefficient
- Knudsen diffusion
References
- CRC Press Online: CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, Section 6, 91st Edition
- Diffusion
- Callister, William D.; Rethwisch, David G. (2012). Fundamentals of materials science and engineering: an integrated approach (4 ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. ISBN 978-1-118-06160-2.
- Cussler, E. L. (1997). Diffusion: Mass Transfer in Fluid Systems (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-45078-0.
- Welty, James R.; Wicks, Charles E.; Wilson, Robert E.; Rorrer, Gregory (2001). Fundamentals of Momentum, Heat, and Mass Transfer. Wiley. ISBN 978-0-470-12868-8.
- Hirschfelder, J.; Curtiss, C. F.; Bird, R. B. (1954). Molecular Theory of Gases and Liquids. New York: Wiley. ISBN 0-471-40065-3.
- "К юбилею Г.И. Канеля". Теплофизика высоких температур (in Russian). 52 (4): 487–488. 2014. doi:10.7868/s0040364414040279. ISSN 0040-3644.
- Chapman, Sydney; Cowling, Thomas George; Burnett, David (1990). The mathematical theory of non-uniform gases: an account of the kinetic theory of viscosity, thermal conduction, and diffusion in gases. Cambridge mathematical library (3rd ed.). Cambridge New York Port Chester [etc.]: Cambridge university press. ISBN 978-0-521-40844-8.
- Cohen, E. G. D. (1993-03-15). "Fifty years of kinetic theory". Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications. 194 (1): 229–257. doi:10.1016/0378-4371(93)90357-A. ISSN 0378-4371.
- Grathwohl, P. (1998). Diffusion in natural porous media: Contaminant transport, sorption / desorption and dissolution kinetics. Kluwer Academic. ISBN 0-7923-8102-5.