Actinide

The actinide (/ˈæktɪnaɪd/) or actinoid (/ˈæktɪnɔɪd/) series encompasses at least the 14 metallic chemical elements in the 5f series, with atomic numbers from 89 to 102, actinium through nobelium. (Number 103, lawrencium, is sometimes also included despite being part of the 6d transition series.) The actinide series derives its name from the first element in the series, actinium. The informal chemical symbol An is used in general discussions of actinide chemistry to refer to any actinide.[1][2][3]

Actinides in the periodic table
Hydrogen Helium
Lithium Beryllium Boron Carbon Nitrogen Oxygen Fluorine Neon
Sodium Magnesium Aluminium Silicon Phosphorus Sulfur Chlorine Argon
Potassium Calcium Scandium Titanium Vanadium Chromium Manganese Iron Cobalt Nickel Copper Zinc Gallium Germanium Arsenic Selenium Bromine Krypton
Rubidium Strontium Yttrium Zirconium Niobium Molybdenum Technetium Ruthenium Rhodium Palladium Silver Cadmium Indium Tin Antimony Tellurium Iodine Xenon
Caesium Barium Lanthanum Cerium Praseodymium Neodymium Promethium Samarium Europium Gadolinium Terbium Dysprosium Holmium Erbium Thulium Ytterbium Lutetium Hafnium Tantalum Tungsten Rhenium Osmium Iridium Platinum Gold Mercury (element) Thallium Lead Bismuth Polonium Astatine Radon
Francium Radium Actinium Thorium Protactinium Uranium Neptunium Plutonium Americium Curium Berkelium Californium Einsteinium Fermium Mendelevium Nobelium Lawrencium Rutherfordium Dubnium Seaborgium Bohrium Hassium Meitnerium Darmstadtium Roentgenium Copernicium Nihonium Flerovium Moscovium Livermorium Tennessine Oganesson
Part of a series on the
Periodic table
Periodic table forms
Periodic table history
Sets of elements
By periodic table structure
By metallic classification
By other characteristics
Elements
List of chemical elements
Properties of elements
Data pages for elements
  • Category
  • Chemistry Portal

The 1985 IUPAC Red Book recommends that actinoid be used rather than actinide, since the suffix -ide normally indicates a negative ion. However, owing to widespread current use, actinide is still allowed. Since actinoid literally means actinium-like (cf. humanoid or android), it has been argued for semantic reasons that actinium cannot logically be an actinoid, but IUPAC acknowledges its inclusion based on common usage.[4]

All the actinides are f-block elements. Lawrencium is sometimes considered one as well, despite being a d-block element[5][6] and a transition metal.[7] The series mostly corresponds to the filling of the 5f electron shell, although as isolated atoms in the ground state many have anomalous configurations involving the filling of the 6d shell due to interelectronic repulsion. In comparison with the lanthanides, also mostly f-block elements, the actinides show much more variable valence. They all have very large atomic and ionic radii and exhibit an unusually large range of physical properties. While actinium and the late actinides (from curium onwards) behave similarly to the lanthanides, the elements thorium, protactinium, and uranium are much more similar to transition metals in their chemistry, with neptunium, plutonium, and americium occupying an intermediate position.

All actinides are radioactive and release energy upon radioactive decay; naturally occurring uranium and thorium, and synthetically produced plutonium are the most abundant actinides on Earth. These have been used in nuclear reactors, and uranium and plutonium are critical elements of nuclear weapons. Uranium and thorium also have diverse current or historical uses, and americium is used in the ionization chambers of most modern smoke detectors.

Of the actinides, primordial thorium and uranium occur naturally in substantial quantities. The radioactive decay of uranium produces transient amounts of actinium and protactinium, and atoms of neptunium and plutonium are occasionally produced from transmutation reactions in uranium ores. The other actinides are purely synthetic elements.[1][8] Nuclear weapons tests have released at least six actinides heavier than plutonium into the environment; analysis of debris from a 1952 hydrogen bomb explosion showed the presence of americium, curium, berkelium, californium, einsteinium and fermium.[9]

In presentations of the periodic table, the f-block elements are customarily shown as two additional rows below the main body of the table.[1] This convention is entirely a matter of aesthetics and formatting practicality; a rarely used wide-formatted periodic table inserts the 4f and 5f series in their proper places, as parts of the table's sixth and seventh rows (periods).

Discovery, isolation and synthesis
Synthesis of transuranium elements[10][notes 1]
Element Year Method
Neptunium 1940 Bombarding 238U with neutrons
Plutonium 1941 Bombarding 238U with deuterons
Americium 1944 Bombarding 239Pu with neutrons
Curium 1944 Bombarding 239Pu with α-particles
Berkelium 1949 Bombarding 241Am with α-particles
Californium 1950 Bombarding 242Cm with α-particles
Einsteinium 1952 As a product of nuclear explosion
Fermium 1952 As a product of nuclear explosion
Mendelevium 1955 Bombarding 253Es with α-particles
Nobelium 1965 Bombarding 243Am with 15N
or 238U with 22Ne
Lawrencium 1961
–1971		 Bombarding 252Cf with 10B or 11B
and of 243Am with 18O

Like the lanthanides, the actinides form a family of elements with similar properties. Within the actinides, there are two overlapping groups: transuranium elements, which follow uranium in the periodic table; and transplutonium elements, which follow plutonium. Compared to the lanthanides, which (except for promethium) are found in nature in appreciable quantities, most actinides are rare. Most do not occur in nature, and of those that do, only thorium and uranium do so in more than trace quantities. The most abundant or easily synthesized actinides are uranium and thorium, followed by plutonium, americium, actinium, protactinium, neptunium, and curium.[11]

The existence of transuranium elements was suggested in 1934 by Enrico Fermi, based on his experiments.[12][13] However, even though four actinides were known by that time, it was not yet understood that they formed a family similar to lanthanides. The prevailing view that dominated early research into transuranics was that they were regular elements in the 7th period, with thorium, protactinium and uranium corresponding to 6th-period hafnium, tantalum and tungsten, respectively. Synthesis of transuranics gradually undermined this point of view. By 1944, an observation that curium failed to exhibit oxidation states above 4 (whereas its supposed 6th period homolog, platinum, can reach oxidation state of 6) prompted Glenn Seaborg to formulate an "actinide hypothesis". Studies of known actinides and discoveries of further transuranic elements provided more data in support of this position, but the phrase "actinide hypothesis" (the implication being that a "hypothesis" is something that has not been decisively proven) remained in active use by scientists through the late 1950s.[14][15]

At present, there are two major methods of producing isotopes of transplutonium elements: (1) irradiation of the lighter elements with neutrons; (2) irradiation with accelerated charged particles. The first method is more important for applications, as only neutron irradiation using nuclear reactors allows the production of sizeable amounts of synthetic actinides; however, it is limited to relatively light elements. The advantage of the second method is that elements heavier than plutonium, as well as neutron-deficient isotopes, can be obtained, which are not formed during neutron irradiation.[16]

In 1962–1966, there were attempts in the United States to produce transplutonium isotopes using a series of six underground nuclear explosions. Small samples of rock were extracted from the blast area immediately after the test to study the explosion products, but no isotopes with mass number greater than 257 could be detected, despite predictions that such isotopes would have relatively long half-lives of α-decay. This non-observation was attributed to spontaneous fission owing to the large speed of the products and to other decay channels, such as neutron emission and nuclear fission.[17]

From actinium to uranium

Uranium and thorium were the first actinides discovered. Uranium was identified in 1789 by the German chemist Martin Heinrich Klaproth in pitchblende ore. He named it after the planet Uranus,[8] which had been discovered eight years earlier. Klaproth was able to precipitate a yellow compound (likely sodium diuranate) by dissolving pitchblende in nitric acid and neutralizing the solution with sodium hydroxide. He then reduced the obtained yellow powder with charcoal, and extracted a black substance that he mistook for metal.[18] Sixty years later, the French scientist Eugène-Melchior Péligot identified it as uranium oxide. He also isolated the first sample of uranium metal by heating uranium tetrachloride with metallic potassium.[19] The atomic mass of uranium was then calculated as 120, but Dmitri Mendeleev in 1872 corrected it to 240 using his periodicity laws. This value was confirmed experimentally in 1882 by K. Zimmerman.[20][21]

Thorium oxide was discovered by Friedrich Wöhler in the mineral thorianite, which was found in Norway (1827).[22] Jöns Jacob Berzelius characterized this material in more detail in 1828. By reduction of thorium tetrachloride with potassium, he isolated the metal and named it thorium after the Norse god of thunder and lightning Thor.[23][24] The same isolation method was later used by Péligot for uranium.[8]

Actinium was discovered in 1899 by André-Louis Debierne, an assistant of Marie Curie, in the pitchblende waste left after removal of radium and polonium. He described the substance (in 1899) as similar to titanium[25] and (in 1900) as similar to thorium.[26] The discovery of actinium by Debierne was however questioned in 1971[27] and 2000,[28] arguing that Debierne's publications in 1904 contradicted his earlier work of 1899–1900. This view instead credits the 1902 work of Friedrich Oskar Giesel, who discovered a radioactive element named emanium that behaved similarly to lanthanum. The name actinium comes from the Ancient Greek: ακτίς, ακτίνος (aktis, aktinos), meaning beam or ray. This metal was discovered not by its own radiation but by the radiation of the daughter products.[29][30] Owing to the close similarity of actinium and lanthanum and low abundance, pure actinium could only be produced in 1950. The term actinide was probably introduced by Victor Goldschmidt in 1937.[31][32]

Protactinium was possibly isolated in 1900 by William Crookes.[33] It was first identified in 1913, when Kasimir Fajans and Oswald Helmuth Göhring encountered the short-lived isotope 234mPa (half-life 1.17 minutes) during their studies of the 238U decay chain. They named the new element brevium (from Latin brevis meaning brief);[34][35] the name was changed to protoactinium (from Greek πρῶτος + ἀκτίς meaning "first beam element") in 1918 when two groups of scientists, led by the Austrian Lise Meitner and Otto Hahn of Germany and Frederick Soddy and John Arnold Cranston of Great Britain, independently discovered the much longer-lived 231Pa. The name was shortened to protactinium in 1949. This element was little characterized until 1960, when Alfred Maddock and his co-workers in the U.K. isolated 130 grams of protactinium from 60 tonnes of waste left after extraction of uranium from its ore.[36]

Neptunium and above

Neptunium (named for the planet Neptune, the next planet out from Uranus, after which uranium was named) was discovered by Edwin McMillan and Philip H. Abelson in 1940 in Berkeley, California.[37] They produced the 239Np isotope (half-life 2.4 days) by bombarding uranium with slow neutrons.[36] It was the first transuranium element produced synthetically.[38]

Transuranium elements do not occur in sizeable quantities in nature and are commonly synthesized via nuclear reactions conducted with nuclear reactors. For example, under irradiation with reactor neutrons, uranium-238 partially converts to plutonium-239:

This synthesis reaction was used by Fermi and his collaborators in their design of the reactors located at the Hanford Site, which produced significant amounts of plutonium-239 for the nuclear weapons of the Manhattan Project and the United States' post-war nuclear arsenal.[39]

Actinides with the highest mass numbers are synthesized by bombarding uranium, plutonium, curium and californium with ions of nitrogen, oxygen, carbon, neon or boron in a particle accelerator. Thus nobelium was produced by bombarding uranium-238 with neon-22 as

.

The first isotopes of transplutonium elements, americium-241 and curium-242, were synthesized in 1944 by Glenn T. Seaborg, Ralph A. James and Albert Ghiorso.[40] Curium-242 was obtained by bombarding plutonium-239 with 32-MeV α-particles:

.

The americium-241 and curium-242 isotopes also were produced by irradiating plutonium in a nuclear reactor. The latter element was named after Marie Curie and her husband Pierre who are noted for discovering radium and for their work in radioactivity.[41]

Bombarding curium-242 with α-particles resulted in an isotope of californium 245Cf in 1950, and a similar procedure yielded berkelium-243 from americium-241 in 1949.[42] The new elements were named after Berkeley, California, by analogy with its lanthanide homologue terbium, which was named after the village of Ytterby in Sweden.[43]

In 1945, B. B. Cunningham obtained the first bulk chemical compound of a transplutonium element, namely americium hydroxide.[44] Over the few years, milligram quantities of americium and microgram amounts of curium were accumulated that allowed production of isotopes of berkelium[45][46] and californium.[47][48][49] Sizeable amounts of these elements were produced in 1958,[50] and the first californium compound (0.3 μg of CfOCl) was obtained in 1960 by B. B. Cunningham and J. C. Wallmann.[51]

Einsteinium and fermium were identified in 1952–1953 in the fallout from the "Ivy Mike" nuclear test (1 November 1952), the first successful test of a hydrogen bomb. Instantaneous exposure of uranium-238 to a large neutron flux resulting from the explosion produced heavy isotopes of uranium, including uranium-253 and uranium-255, and their β-decay yielded einsteinium-253 and fermium-255. The discovery of the new elements and the new data on neutron capture were initially kept secret on the orders of the US military until 1955 due to Cold War tensions.[9][52] Nevertheless, the Berkeley team were able to prepare einsteinium and fermium by civilian means, through the neutron bombardment of plutonium-239, and published this work in 1954 with the disclaimer that it was not the first studies that had been carried out on those elements.[53][54] The "Ivy Mike" studies were declassified and published in 1955.[52] The first significant (submicrogram) amounts of einsteinium were produced in 1961 by Cunningham and colleagues, but this has not been done for fermium yet.[55]

The first isotope of mendelevium, 256Md (half-life 87 min), was synthesized by Albert Ghiorso, Glenn T. Seaborg, Gregory Robert Choppin, Bernard G. Harvey and Stanley Gerald Thompson when they bombarded an 253Es target with alpha particles in the 60-inch cyclotron of Berkeley Radiation Laboratory; this was the first isotope of any element to be synthesized one atom at a time.[56]

There were several attempts to obtain isotopes of nobelium by Swedish (1957) and American (1958) groups, but the first reliable result was the synthesis of 256No by the Russian group of Georgy Flyorov in 1965, as acknowledged by the IUPAC in 1992. In their experiments, Flyorov et al. bombarded uranium-238 with neon-22.[10]

In 1961, Ghiorso et al. obtained the first isotope of lawrencium by irradiating californium (mostly californium-252) with boron-10 and boron-11 ions.[10] The mass number of this isotope was not clearly established (possibly 258 or 259) at the time. In 1965, 256Lr was synthesized by Flyorov et al. from 243Am and 18O. Thus IUPAC recognized the nuclear physics teams at Dubna and Berkeley as the co-discoverers of lawrencium.

Isotopes

33 isotopes of actinium and eight excited isomeric states of some of its nuclides are known, ranging in mass number from 204 to 236.[57] Three isotopes, 225Ac, 227Ac and 228Ac, were found in nature and the others were produced in the laboratory; only the three natural isotopes are used in applications. Actinium-225 is a member of the radioactive neptunium series;[60] it was first discovered in 1947 as a decay product of uranium-233 and it is an α-emitter with a half-life of 10 days. Actinium-225 is less available than actinium-228, but is more promising in radiotracer applications.[30] Actinium-227 (half-life 21.77 years) occurs in all uranium ores, but in small quantities. One gram of uranium (in radioactive equilibrium) contains only 2×10−10 gram of 227Ac.[30][57] Actinium-228 is a member of the radioactive thorium series formed by the decay of 228Ra;[60] it is a β− emitter with a half-life of 6.15 hours. In one tonne of thorium there is 5×10−8 gram of 228Ac. It was discovered by Otto Hahn in 1906.[30]

There are 32 known isotopes of thorium ranging in mass number from 207 to 238.[57] Of these, the longest-lived is 232Th, whose half-life of 1.4×1010 years means that it still exists in nature as a primordial nuclide. The next longest-lived is 230Th, an intermediate decay product of 238U with a half-life of 75,400 years. Several other thorium isotopes have half-lives over a day; all of these are also transient in the decay chains of 232Th, 235U, and 238U.

28 isotopes of protactinium are known with mass numbers 212–239[57] as well as three excited isomeric states. Only 231Pa and 234Pa have been found in nature. All the isotopes have short lifetimes, except for protactinium-231 (half-life 32,760 years). The most important isotopes are 231Pa and 233Pa, which is an intermediate product in obtaining uranium-233 and is the most affordable among artificial isotopes of protactinium. 233Pa has convenient half-life and energy of γ-radiation, and thus was used in most studies of protactinium chemistry. Protactinium-233 is a β-emitter with a half-life of 26.97 days.[57][61]

There are 27 known isotopes of uranium, having mass numbers 215–242 (except 220).[58] Three of them, 234U, 235U and 238U, are present in appreciable quantities in nature. Among others, the most important is 233U, which is a final product of transformation of 232Th irradiated by slow neutrons. 233U has a much higher fission efficiency by low-energy (thermal) neutrons, compared e.g. with 235U. Most uranium chemistry studies were carried out on uranium-238 owing to its long half-life of 4.4×109 years.[62]

There are 25 isotopes of neptunium with mass numbers 219–244 (except 221);[58] they are all highly radioactive. The most popular among scientists are long-lived 237Np (t1/2 = 2.20×106 years) and short-lived 239Np, 238Np (t1/2 ~ 2 days).[38]

There are 20 known isotopes of plutonium, having mass numbers 228–247.[58] The most stable isotope of plutonium is 244Pu with half-life of 8.13×107 years.[57]

Eighteen isotopes of americium are known with mass numbers from 229 to 247 (with the exception of 231).[58] The most important are 241Am and 243Am, which are alpha-emitters and also emit soft, but intense γ-rays; both of them can be obtained in an isotopically pure form. Chemical properties of americium were first studied with 241Am, but later shifted to 243Am, which is almost 20 times less radioactive. The disadvantage of 243Am is production of the short-lived daughter isotope 239Np, which has to be considered in the data analysis.[63]

Among 19 isotopes of curium, ranging in mass number from 233 to 251,[58] the most accessible are 242Cm and 244Cm; they are α-emitters, but with much shorter lifetime than the americium isotopes. These isotopes emit almost no γ-radiation, but undergo spontaneous fission with the associated emission of neutrons. More long-lived isotopes of curium (245–248Cm, all α-emitters) are formed as a mixture during neutron irradiation of plutonium or americium. Upon short irradiation, this mixture is dominated by 246Cm, and then 248Cm begins to accumulate. Both of these isotopes, especially 248Cm, have a longer half-life (3.48×105 years) and are much more convenient for carrying out chemical research than 242Cm and 244Cm, but they also have a rather high rate of spontaneous fission. 247Cm has the longest lifetime among isotopes of curium (1.56×107 years), but is not formed in large quantities because of the strong fission induced by thermal neutrons.

Seventeen isotopes of berkelium have been identified with mass numbers 233, 234, 236, 238, and 240–252.[58] Only 249Bk is available in large quantities; it has a relatively short half-life of 330 days and emits mostly soft β-particles, which are inconvenient for detection. Its alpha radiation is rather weak (1.45×10−3% with respect to β-radiation), but is sometimes used to detect this isotope. 247Bk is an alpha-emitter with a long half-life of 1,380 years, but it is hard to obtain in appreciable quantities; it is not formed upon neutron irradiation of plutonium because β-decay of curium isotopes with mass number below 248 is not known.[63] (247Cm would actually release energy by β-decaying to 247Bk, but this has never been seen.)

The 20 isotopes of californium with mass numbers 237–256 are formed in nuclear reactors;[58] californium-253 is a β-emitter and the rest are α-emitters. The isotopes with even mass numbers (250Cf, 252Cf and 254Cf) have a high rate of spontaneous fission, especially 254Cf of which 99.7% decays by spontaneous fission. Californium-249 has a relatively long half-life (352 years), weak spontaneous fission and strong γ-emission that facilitates its identification. 249Cf is not formed in large quantities in a nuclear reactor because of the slow β-decay of the parent isotope 249Bk and a large cross section of interaction with neutrons, but it can be accumulated in the isotopically pure form as the β-decay product of (pre-selected) 249Bk. Californium produced by reactor-irradiation of plutonium mostly consists of 250Cf and 252Cf, the latter being predominant for large neutron fluences, and its study is hindered by the strong neutron radiation.[64]

Properties of some transplutonium isotope pairs[65]
Parent
isotope		 t1/2 Daughter
isotope		 t1/2 Time to establish
radioactive equilibrium
243Am7370 years239Np2.35 days47.3 days
245Cm8265 years241Pu14 years129 years
247Cm1.64×107 years243Pu4.95 hours7.2 days
254Es270 days250Bk3.2 hours35.2 hours
255Es39.8 days255Fm22 hours5 days
257Fm79 days253Cf17.6 days49 days

Among the 18 known isotopes of einsteinium with mass numbers from 240 to 257,[58] the most affordable is 253Es. It is an α-emitter with a half-life of 20.47 days, a relatively weak γ-emission and small spontaneous fission rate as compared with the isotopes of californium. Prolonged neutron irradiation also produces a long-lived isotope 254Es (t1/2 = 275.5 days).[64]

Twenty isotopes of fermium are known with mass numbers of 241–260. 254Fm, 255Fm and 256Fm are α-emitters with a short half-life (hours), which can be isolated in significant amounts. 257Fm (t1/2 = 100 days) can accumulate upon prolonged and strong irradiation. All these isotopes are characterized by high rates of spontaneous fission.[64][66]

Among the 17 known isotopes of mendelevium (mass numbers from 244 to 260),[58] the most studied is 256Md, which mainly decays through electron capture (α-radiation is ≈10%) with a half-life of 77 minutes. Another alpha emitter, 258Md, has a half-life of 53 days. Both these isotopes are produced from rare einsteinium (253Es and 255Es respectively), that therefore limits their availability.[57]

Long-lived isotopes of nobelium and isotopes of lawrencium (and of heavier elements) have relatively short half-lives. For nobelium, 13 isotopes are known, with mass numbers 249–260 and 262. The chemical properties of nobelium and lawrencium were studied with 255No (t1/2 = 3 min) and 256Lr (t1/2 = 35 s). The longest-lived nobelium isotope, 259No, has a half-life of approximately 1 hour.[57] Lawrencium has 14 known isotopes with mass numbers 251–262, 264, and 266. The most stable of them is 266Lr with a half life of 11 hours.

Among all of these, the only isotopes that occur in sufficient quantities in nature to be detected in anything more than traces and have a measurable contribution to the atomic weights of the actinides are the primordial 232Th, 235U, and 238U, and three long-lived decay products of natural uranium, 230Th, 231Pa, and 234U. Natural thorium consists of 0.02(2)% 230Th and 99.98(2)% 232Th; natural protactinium consists of 100% 231Pa; and natural uranium consists of 0.0054(5)% 234U, 0.7204(6)% 235U, and 99.2742(10)% 238U.[67]

Formation in nuclear reactors

The figure buildup of actinides is a table of nuclides with the number of neutrons on the horizontal axis (isotopes) and the number of protons on the vertical axis (elements). The red dot divides the nuclides in two groups, so the figure is more compact. Each nuclide is represented by a square with the mass number of the element and its half-life.[68] Naturally existing actinide isotopes (Th, U) are marked with a bold border, alpha emitters have a yellow colour, and beta emitters have a blue colour. Pink indicates electron capture (236Np), whereas white stands for a long-lasting metastable state (242Am).

The formation of actinide nuclides is primarily characterised by:[69]

  • Neutron capture reactions (n,γ), which are represented in the figure by a short right arrow.
  • The (n,2n) reactions and the less frequently occurring (γ,n) reactions are also taken into account, both of which are marked by a short left arrow.
  • Even more rarely and only triggered by fast neutrons, the (n,3n) reaction occurs, which is represented in the figure with one example, marked by a long left arrow.

In addition to these neutron- or gamma-induced nuclear reactions, the radioactive conversion of actinide nuclides also affects the nuclide inventory in a reactor. These decay types are marked in the figure by diagonal arrows. The beta-minus decay, marked with an arrow pointing up-left, plays a major role for the balance of the particle densities of the nuclides. Nuclides decaying by positron emission (beta-plus decay) or electron capture (ϵ) do not occur in a nuclear reactor except as products of knockout reactions; their decays are marked with arrows pointing down-right. Due to the long half-lives of the given nuclides, alpha decay plays almost no role in the formation and decay of the actinides in a power reactor, as the residence time of the nuclear fuel in the reactor core is rather short (a few years). Exceptions are the two relatively short-lived nuclides 242Cm (T1/2 = 163 d) and 236Pu (T1/2 = 2.9 y). Only for these two cases, the α decay is marked on the nuclide map by a long arrow pointing down-left. A few long-lived actinide isotopes, such as 244Pu and 250Cm, cannot be produced in reactors because neutron capture does not happen quickly enough to bypass the short-lived beta-decaying nuclides 243Pu and 249Cm; they can however be generated in nuclear explosions, which have much higher neutron fluxes.

Distribution in nature

Thorium and uranium are the most abundant actinides in nature with the respective mass concentrations of 16 ppm and 4 ppm.[70] Uranium mostly occurs in the Earth's crust as a mixture of its oxides in the mineral uraninite, which is also called pitchblende because of its black color. There are several dozens of other uranium minerals such as carnotite (KUO2VO4·3H2O) and autunite (Ca(UO2)2(PO4)2·nH2O). The isotopic composition of natural uranium is 238U (relative abundance 99.2742%), 235U (0.7204%) and 234U (0.0054%); of these 238U has the largest half-life of 4.51×109 years.[71][72] The worldwide production of uranium in 2009 amounted to 50,572 tonnes, of which 27.3% was mined in Kazakhstan. Other important uranium mining countries are Canada (20.1%), Australia (15.7%), Namibia (9.1%), Russia (7.0%), and Niger (6.4%).[73]

Content of plutonium in uranium and thorium ores[74]
Ore Location Uranium
content, %		 Mass ratio
239Pu/ore		 Ratio
239Pu/U (×10−12)
UraniniteCanada13.59.1×10−127.1
UraniniteCongo384.8×10−1212
UraniniteColorado, US503.8×10−127.7
MonaziteBrazil0.242.1×10−148.3
MonaziteNorth Carolina, US1.645.9×10−143.6
Fergusonite-0.25<1×10−14<4
Carnotite-10<4×10−14<0.4

The most abundant thorium minerals are thorianite (ThO2), thorite (ThSiO4) and monazite, ((Th,Ca,Ce)PO4). Most thorium minerals contain uranium and vice versa; and they all have significant fraction of lanthanides. Rich deposits of thorium minerals are located in the United States (440,000 tonnes), Australia and India (~300,000 tonnes each) and Canada (~100,000 tonnes).[75]

The abundance of actinium in the Earth's crust is only about 5×10−15%.[61] Actinium is mostly present in uranium-containing, but also in other minerals, though in much smaller quantities. The content of actinium in most natural objects corresponds to the isotopic equilibrium of parent isotope 235U, and it is not affected by the weak Ac migration.[30] Protactinium is more abundant (10−12%) in the Earth's crust than actinium. It was discovered in uranium ore in 1913 by Fajans and Göhring.[34] As actinium, the distribution of protactinium follows that of 235U.[61]

The half-life of the longest-lived isotope of neptunium, 237Np, is negligible compared to the age of the Earth. Thus neptunium is present in nature in negligible amounts produced as intermediate decay products of other isotopes.[38] Traces of plutonium in uranium minerals were first found in 1942, and the more systematic results on 239Pu are summarized in the table (no other plutonium isotopes could be detected in those samples). The upper limit of abundance of the longest-living isotope of plutonium, 244Pu, is 3×10−20%. Plutonium could not be detected in samples of lunar soil. Owing to its scarcity in nature, most plutonium is produced synthetically.[74]

Extraction

Owing to the low abundance of actinides, their extraction is a complex, multistep process. Fluorides of actinides are usually used because they are insoluble in water and can be easily separated with redox reactions. Fluorides are reduced with calcium, magnesium or barium:[76]

Among the actinides, thorium and uranium are the easiest to isolate. Thorium is extracted mostly from monazite: thorium pyrophosphate (ThP2O7) is reacted with nitric acid, and the produced thorium nitrate treated with tributyl phosphate. Rare-earth impurities are separated by increasing the pH in sulfate solution.[76]

In another extraction method, monazite is decomposed with a 45% aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide at 140 °C. Mixed metal hydroxides are extracted first, filtered at 80 °C, washed with water and dissolved with concentrated hydrochloric acid. Next, the acidic solution is neutralized with hydroxides to pH = 5.8 that results in precipitation of thorium hydroxide (Th(OH)4) contaminated with ~3% of rare-earth hydroxides; the rest of rare-earth hydroxides remains in solution. Thorium hydroxide is dissolved in an inorganic acid and then purified from the rare earth elements. An efficient method is the dissolution of thorium hydroxide in nitric acid, because the resulting solution can be purified by extraction with organic solvents:[76]

Th(OH)4 + 4 HNO3 → Th(NO3)4 + 4 H2O

Metallic thorium is separated from the anhydrous oxide, chloride or fluoride by reacting it with calcium in an inert atmosphere:[78]

ThO2 + 2 Ca → 2 CaO + Th

Sometimes thorium is extracted by electrolysis of a fluoride in a mixture of sodium and potassium chloride at 700–800 °C in a graphite crucible. Highly pure thorium can be extracted from its iodide with the crystal bar process.[79]

Uranium is extracted from its ores in various ways. In one method, the ore is burned and then reacted with nitric acid to convert uranium into a dissolved state. Treating the solution with a solution of tributyl phosphate (TBP) in kerosene transforms uranium into an organic form UO2(NO3)2(TBP)2. The insoluble impurities are filtered and the uranium is extracted by reaction with hydroxides as (NH4)2U2O7 or with hydrogen peroxide as UO4·2H2O.[76]

When the uranium ore is rich in such minerals as dolomite, magnesite, etc., those minerals consume much acid. In this case, the carbonate method is used for uranium extraction. Its main component is an aqueous solution of sodium carbonate, which converts uranium into a complex [UO2(CO3)3]4−, which is stable in aqueous solutions at low concentrations of hydroxide ions. The advantages of the sodium carbonate method are that the chemicals have low corrosivity (compared to nitrates) and that most non-uranium metals precipitate from the solution. The disadvantage is that tetravalent uranium compounds precipitate as well. Therefore, the uranium ore is treated with sodium carbonate at elevated temperature and under oxygen pressure:

2 UO2 + O2 + 6 CO2−
3 → 2 [UO2(CO3)3]4−

This equation suggests that the best solvent for the uranyl carbonate processing is a mixture of carbonate with bicarbonate. At high pH, this results in precipitation of diuranate, which is treated with hydrogen in the presence of nickel yielding an insoluble uranium tetracarbonate.[76]

Another separation method uses polymeric resins as a polyelectrolyte. Ion exchange processes in the resins result in separation of uranium. Uranium from resins is washed with a solution of ammonium nitrate or nitric acid that yields uranyl nitrate, UO2(NO3)2·6H2O. When heated, it turns into UO3, which is converted to UO2 with hydrogen:

UO3 + H2 → UO2 + H2O

Reacting uranium dioxide with hydrofluoric acid changes it to uranium tetrafluoride, which yields uranium metal upon reaction with magnesium metal:[78]

4 HF + UO2 → UF4 + 2 H2O

To extract plutonium, neutron-irradiated uranium is dissolved in nitric acid, and a reducing agent (FeSO4, or H2O2) is added to the resulting solution. This addition changes the oxidation state of plutonium from +6 to +4, while uranium remains in the form of uranyl nitrate (UO2(NO3)2). The solution is treated with a reducing agent and neutralized with ammonium carbonate to pH = 8 that results in precipitation of Pu4+ compounds.[76]

In another method, Pu4+ and UO2+
2 are first extracted with tributyl phosphate, then reacted with hydrazine washing out the recovered plutonium.[76]

The major difficulty in separation of actinium is the similarity of its properties with those of lanthanum. Thus actinium is either synthesized in nuclear reactions from isotopes of radium or separated using ion-exchange procedures.[30]

Properties

Actinides have similar properties to lanthanides. Just as the 4f electron shells are filled in the lanthanides, the 5f electron shells are filled in the actinides. Because the 5f, 6d, 7s, and 7p shells are close in energy, many irregular configurations arise; thus, in gas-phase atoms, just as the first 4f electron only appears in cerium, so the first 5f electron appears even later, in protactinium. However, just as lanthanum is the first element to use the 4f shell in compounds,[80] so actinium is the first element to use the 5f shell in compounds.[81] The f-shells complete their filling together, at ytterbium and nobelium.[82] The first experimental evidence for the filling of the 5f shell in actinides was obtained by McMillan and Abelson in 1940.[83] As in lanthanides (see lanthanide contraction), the ionic radius of actinides monotonically decreases with atomic number (see also Aufbau principle).[84]

The shift of electron configurations in the gas phase does not always match the chemical behaviour. For example, the early-transition-metal-like prominence of the highest oxidation state, corresponding to removal of all valence electrons, extends up to uranium even though the 5f shells begin filling before that. On the other hand, electron configurations resembling the lanthanide congeners already begin at plutonium, even though lanthanide-like behaviour does not become dominant until the second half of the series begins at curium. The elements between uranium and curium form a transition between these two kinds of behaviour, where higher oxidation states continue to exist, but lose stability with respect to the +3 state.[82] The +2 state becomes more important near the end of the series, and is the most stable oxidation state for nobelium, the last 5f element.[82] Oxidation states rise again only after nobelium, showing that a new series of 6d transition metals has begun: lawrencium shows only the +3 oxidation state, and rutherfordium only the +4 state, making them congeners of lutetium and hafnium in the 5d row.[82]

Properties of actinides (the mass of the most long-lived isotope is in square brackets)[72][85]
Element AcThPaUNpPuAmCmBkCfEsFmMdNoLr
Core charge (Z) 8990919293949596979899100101102103
Atomic mass [227]232.0377(4)231.03588(2)238.02891(3)[237][244][243][247][247][251][252][257][258][259][266]
Number of natural isotopes[86] 383834000000000
Natural isotopes[86][87] 225, 227, 228227–234231, 233, 234233–240237, 239, 240238–240, 244—————————
Natural quantity isotopes —230, 232231234, 235, 238———————————
Longest-lived isotope 227232231238237244243247247251252257258259266
Half-life of the longest-lived isotope 21.8 years14 billion years32,500 years4.47 billion years2.14 million years80.8 million years7,370 years15.6 million years1,380 years900 years1.29 years100.5 days52 days58 min11 hours
Most common isotope 227232231238237239241244249252253255256255260
Half-life of the most common isotope 21.8 years14 billion years32,500 years4.47 billion years2.14 million years24,100 years433 years18.1 years320 days2.64 years20.47 days20.07 hours78 min3.1 min2.7 min
Electronic configuration in
the ground state (gas phase)		 6d17s26d27s25f26d17s25f36d17s25f46d17s25f67s25f77s25f76d17s25f97s25f107s25f117s25f127s25f137s25f147s25f147s27p1
Oxidation states 2, 32, 3, 42, 3, 4, 52, 3, 4, 5, 63, 4, 5, 6, 73, 4, 5, 6, 72, 3, 4, 5, 6, 72, 3, 4, 62, 3, 42, 3, 42, 3, 42, 32, 32, 33
Metallic radius (nm) 0.2030.1800.1620.1530.1500.1620.1730.1740.1700.1860.186 ? 0.198 ? 0.194 ? 0.197 ? 0.171
Ionic radius (nm):
An4+
An3+
—
0.126
0.114
—
0.104
0.118
0.103
0.118
0.101
0.116
0.100
0.115
0.099
0.114
0.099
0.112
0.097
0.110
0.096
0.109
0.085
0.098
0.084
0.091
0.084
0.090
0.084
0.095
0.083
0.088
Temperature (°C):
melting
boiling		 1050
3198		1842
4788		1568
? 4027		1132.2
4131		639
? 4174		639.4
3228		1176
? 2607		1340
3110		986
2627
900
? 1470		860
? 996		1530
—		830
—		830
—		1630
—
Density, g/cm3 10.0711.7815.3719.0620.4519.8411.713.5114.7815.18.84? 9.7? 10.3? 9.9? 14.4
Standard electrode potential (V):
E° (An4+/An0)
E° (An3+/An0)		 —
−2.13
−1.83
—
−1.47
—
−1.38
−1.66
−1.30
−1.79
−1.25
−2.00
−0.90
−2.07
−0.75
−2.06
−0.55
−1.96
−0.59
−1.97
−0.36
−1.98
−0.29
−1.96
—
−1.74
—
−1.20
—
−2.10
Color:
[M(H2O)n]4+
[M(H2O)n]3+
—
Colorless
Colorless
Blue
Yellow
Dark blue
Green
Purple
Yellow-green
Purple
Brown
Violet
Red
Rose
Yellow
Colorless
Beige
Yellow-green
Green
Green
—
Pink
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Approximate colors of actinide ions in aqueous solution
Colors for the actinides 100–103 are unknown as sufficient quantities have not yet been synthesized. The colour of CmO2+2 was likewise not recorded.

[88][89]

Actinide (Z)8990919293949596979899100101102103
Oxidation state
+2 Fm2+Md2+No2+
+3 Ac3+ Th3+ Pa3+ U3+ Np3+ Pu3+ Am3+ Cm3+ Bk3+ Cf3+ Es3+ Fm3+ Md3+ No3+ Lr3+
+4 Th4+ Pa4+ U4+ Np4+ Pu4+ Am4+ Cm4+ Bk4+ Cf4+
+5 PaO+
2		 UO+
2		 NpO+
2		 PuO+
2		 AmO+
2
+6 UO2+
2		 NpO2+
2		 PuO2+
2		 AmO2+
2		 CmO2+
2
+7 NpO3+
2		 PuO3+
2		 AmO3−
5

Physical properties
Major crystal structures of some actinides vs. temperature Metallic and ionic radii of actinides[85]

Actinides are typical metals. All of them are soft and have a silvery color (but tarnish in air),[90] relatively high density and plasticity. Some of them can be cut with a knife. Their electrical resistivity varies between 15 and 150 μΩ·cm.[85] The hardness of thorium is similar to that of soft steel, so heated pure thorium can be rolled in sheets and pulled into wire. Thorium is nearly half as dense as uranium and plutonium, but is harder than either of them. All actinides are radioactive, paramagnetic, and, with the exception of actinium, have several crystalline phases: plutonium has seven, and uranium, neptunium and californium three. The crystal structures of protactinium, uranium, neptunium and plutonium do not have clear analogs among the lanthanides and are more similar to those of the 3d-transition metals.[72]

All actinides are pyrophoric, especially when finely divided, that is, they spontaneously ignite upon reaction with air at room temperature.[90][91] The melting point of actinides does not have a clear dependence on the number of f-electrons. The unusually low melting point of neptunium and plutonium (~640 °C) is explained by hybridization of 5f and 6d orbitals and the formation of directional bonds in these metals.[72]

Chemical properties

Like the lanthanides, all actinides are highly reactive with halogens and chalcogens; however, the actinides react more easily. Actinides, especially those with a small number of 5f-electrons, are prone to hybridization. This is explained by the similarity of the electron energies at the 5f, 7s and 6d shells. Most actinides exhibit a larger variety of valence states, and the most stable are +6 for uranium, +5 for protactinium and neptunium, +4 for thorium and plutonium and +3 for actinium and other actinides.[93]

Actinium is chemically similar to lanthanum, which is explained by their similar ionic radii and electronic structures. Like lanthanum, actinium almost always has an oxidation state of +3 in compounds, but it is less reactive and has more pronounced basic properties. Among other trivalent actinides Ac3+ is least acidic, i.e. has the weakest tendency to hydrolyze in aqueous solutions.[30][72]

Thorium is rather active chemically. Owing to lack of electrons on 6d and 5f orbitals, tetravalent thorium compounds are colorless. At pH < 3, solutions of thorium salts are dominated by the cations [Th(H2O)8]4+. The Th4+ ion is relatively large, and depending on the coordination number can have a radius between 0.95 and 1.14 Å. As a result, thorium salts have a weak tendency to hydrolyse. The distinctive ability of thorium salts is their high solubility both in water and polar organic solvents.[72]

Protactinium exhibits two valence states; the +5 is stable, and the +4 state easily oxidizes to protactinium(V). Thus tetravalent protactinium in solutions is obtained by the action of strong reducing agents in a hydrogen atmosphere. Tetravalent protactinium is chemically similar to uranium(IV) and thorium(IV). Fluorides, phosphates, hypophosphates, iodates and phenylarsonates of protactinium(IV) are insoluble in water and dilute acids. Protactinium forms soluble carbonates. The hydrolytic properties of pentavalent protactinium are close to those of tantalum(V) and niobium(V). The complex chemical behavior of protactinium is a consequence of the start of the filling of the 5f shell in this element.[61]

Uranium has a valence from 3 to 6, the last being most stable. In the hexavalent state, uranium is very similar to the group 6 elements. Many compounds of uranium(IV) and uranium(VI) are non-stoichiometric, i.e. have variable composition. For example, the actual chemical formula of uranium dioxide is UO2+x, where x varies between −0.4 and 0.32. Uranium(VI) compounds are weak oxidants. Most of them contain the linear "uranyl" group, UO2+
2. Between 4 and 6 ligands can be accommodated in an equatorial plane perpendicular to the uranyl group. The uranyl group acts as a hard acid and forms stronger complexes with oxygen-donor ligands than with nitrogen-donor ligands. NpO2+
2 and PuO2+
2 are also the common form of Np and Pu in the +6 oxidation state. Uranium(IV) compounds exhibit reducing properties, e.g., they are easily oxidized by atmospheric oxygen. Uranium(III) is a very strong reducing agent. Owing to the presence of d-shell, uranium (as well as many other actinides) forms organometallic compounds, such as UIII(C5H5)3 and UIV(C5H5)4.[72][94]

Neptunium has valence states from 3 to 7, which can be simultaneously observed in solutions. The most stable state in solution is +5, but the valence +4 is preferred in solid neptunium compounds. Neptunium metal is very reactive. Ions of neptunium are prone to hydrolysis and formation of coordination compounds.[38]

Plutonium also exhibits valence states between 3 and 7 inclusive, and thus is chemically similar to neptunium and uranium. It is highly reactive, and quickly forms an oxide film in air. Plutonium reacts with hydrogen even at temperatures as low as 25–50 °C; it also easily forms halides and intermetallic compounds. Hydrolysis reactions of plutonium ions of different oxidation states are quite diverse. Plutonium(V) can enter polymerization reactions.[95][96]

The largest chemical diversity among actinides is observed in americium, which can have valence between 2 and 6. Divalent americium is obtained only in dry compounds and non-aqueous solutions (acetonitrile). Oxidation states +3, +5 and +6 are typical for aqueous solutions, but also in the solid state. Tetravalent americium forms stable solid compounds (dioxide, fluoride and hydroxide) as well as complexes in aqueous solutions. It was reported that in alkaline solution americium can be oxidized to the heptavalent state, but these data proved erroneous. The most stable valence of americium is 3 in aqueous solution and 3 or 4 in solid compounds.[97]

Valence 3 is dominant in all subsequent elements up to lawrencium (with the exception of nobelium). Curium can be tetravalent in solids (fluoride, dioxide). Berkelium, along with a valence of +3, also shows the valence of +4, more stable than that of curium; the valence 4 is observed in solid fluoride and dioxide. The stability of Bk4+ in aqueous solution is close to that of Ce4+.[98] Only valence 3 was observed for californium, einsteinium and fermium. The divalent state is proven for mendelevium and nobelium, and in nobelium it is more stable than the trivalent state. Lawrencium shows valence 3 both in solutions and solids.[97]

The redox potential increases from −0.32 V in uranium, through 0.34 V (Np) and 1.04 V (Pu) to 1.34 V in americium revealing the increasing reduction ability of the An4+ ion from americium to uranium. All actinides form AnH3 hydrides of black color with salt-like properties. Actinides also produce carbides with the general formula of AnC or AnC2 (U2C3 for uranium) as well as sulfides An2S3 and AnS2.[93]

  • Uranyl nitrate (UO2(NO3)2)
  • Aqueous solutions of uranium III, IV, V, VI salts
  • Aqueous solutions of neptunium III, IV, V, VI, VII salts
  • Aqueous solutions of plutonium III, IV, V, VI, VII salts
  • Uranium tetrachloride
  • Uranium hexafluoride
  • U3O8 (yellowcake)

Compounds

Oxides and hydroxides
Dioxides of some actinides
Chemical formula ThO2PaO2UO2NpO2PuO2AmO2CmO2BkO2CfO2
CAS Number 1314-20-112036-03-21344-57-612035-79-912059-95-912005-67-312016-67-012010-84-312015–10–0
Molar mass 264.04263.035270.03269.047276.063275.06270–284**279.069283.078
Melting point[104] 3390 °C2865 °C2547 °C2400 °C2175 °C
Crystal structure
An4+: __  /  O2−: __
Space group Fm3m
Coordination number An[8], O[4]
An – actinide
**Depending on the isotopes

Some actinides can exist in several oxide forms such as An2O3, AnO2, An2O5 and AnO3. For all actinides, oxides AnO3 are amphoteric and An2O3, AnO2 and An2O5 are basic, they easily react with water, forming bases:[93]

An2O3 + 3 H2O → 2 An(OH)3.

These bases are poorly soluble in water and by their activity are close to the hydroxides of rare-earth metals.[93] Np(OH)3 has not yet been synthesized, Pu(OH)3 has a blue color while Am(OH)3 is pink and Cm(OH)3 is colorless.[105] Bk(OH)3 and Cf(OH)3 are also known, as are tetravalent hydroxides for Np, Pu and Am and pentavalent for Np and Am.[105]

The strongest base is of actinium. All compounds of actinium are colorless, except for black actinium sulfide (Ac2S3).[93] Dioxides of tetravalent actinides crystallize in the cubic system, same as in calcium fluoride.

Thorium reacting with oxygen exclusively forms the dioxide:

Thorium dioxide is a refractory material with the highest melting point among any known oxide (3390 °C).[103] Adding 0.8–1% ThO2 to tungsten stabilizes its structure, so the doped filaments have better mechanical stability to vibrations. To dissolve ThO2 in acids, it is heated to 500–600 °C; heating above 600 °C produces a very resistant to acids and other reagents form of ThO2. Small addition of fluoride ions catalyses dissolution of thorium dioxide in acids.

Two protactinium oxides have been obtained: PaO2 (black) and Pa2O5 (white); the former is isomorphic with ThO2 and the latter is easier to obtain. Both oxides are basic, and Pa(OH)5 is a weak, poorly soluble base.[93]

Decomposition of certain salts of uranium, for example UO2(NO3)·6H2O in air at 400 °C, yields orange or yellow UO3.[103] This oxide is amphoteric and forms several hydroxides, the most stable being uranyl hydroxide UO2(OH)2. Reaction of uranium(VI) oxide with hydrogen results in uranium dioxide, which is similar in its properties with ThO2. This oxide is also basic and corresponds to the uranium hydroxide U(OH)4.[93]

Plutonium, neptunium and americium form two basic oxides: An2O3 and AnO2. Neptunium trioxide is unstable; thus, only Np3O8 could be obtained so far. However, the oxides of plutonium and neptunium with the chemical formula AnO2 and An2O3 are well characterized.[93]

Salts
Trichlorides of some actinides[106]
Chemical formula AcCl3UCl3NpCl3PuCl3AmCl3CmCl3BkCl3CfCl3
CAS-number 22986-54-510025-93-120737-06-813569-62-513464-46-513537-20-713536-46-413536–90–8
Molar mass 333.386344.387343.406350.32349.42344–358**353.428357.438
Melting point 837 °C800 °C767 °C715 °C695 °C603 °C545 °C
Boiling point 1657 °C1767 °C850 °C
Crystal structure
An3+: __  /  Cl−: __
Space group P63/m
Coordination number An*[9], Cl [3]
Lattice constants a = 762 pm
c = 455 pm		a = 745.2 pm
c = 432.8 pm		a = 739.4 pm
c = 424.3 pm		a = 738.2 pm
c = 421.4 pm		a = 726 pm
c = 414 pm		a = 738.2 pm
c = 412.7 pm		a = 738 pm
c = 409 pm
*An – actinide
**Depending on the isotopes

Actinides easily react with halogens forming salts with the formulas MX3 and MX4 (X = halogen). So the first berkelium compound, BkCl3, was synthesized in 1962 with an amount of 3 nanograms. Like the halogens of rare earth elements, actinide chlorides, bromides, and iodides are water-soluble, and fluorides are insoluble. Uranium easily yields a colorless hexafluoride, which sublimates at a temperature of 56.5 °C; because of its volatility, it is used in the separation of uranium isotopes with gas centrifuge or gaseous diffusion. Actinide hexafluorides have properties close to anhydrides. They are very sensitive to moisture and hydrolyze forming AnO2F2.[109] The pentachloride and black hexachloride of uranium were synthesized, but they are both unstable.[93]

Action of acids on actinides yields salts, and if the acids are non-oxidizing then the actinide in the salt is in low-valence state:

U + 2 H2SO4 → U(SO4)2 + 2 H2
2 Pu + 6 HCl → 2 PuCl3 + 3 H2

However, in these reactions the regenerating hydrogen can react with the metal, forming the corresponding hydride. Uranium reacts with acids and water much more easily than thorium.[93]

Actinide salts can also be obtained by dissolving the corresponding hydroxides in acids. Nitrates, chlorides, sulfates and perchlorates of actinides are water-soluble. When crystallizing from aqueous solutions, these salts form hydrates, such as Th(NO3)4·6H2O, Th(SO4)2·9H2O and Pu2(SO4)3·7H2O. Salts of high-valence actinides easily hydrolyze. So, colorless sulfate, chloride, perchlorate and nitrate of thorium transform into basic salts with formulas Th(OH)2SO4 and Th(OH)3NO3. The solubility and insolubility of trivalent and tetravalent actinides is like that of lanthanide salts. So phosphates, fluorides, oxalates, iodates and carbonates of actinides are weakly soluble in water; they precipitate as hydrates, such as ThF4·3H2O and Th(CrO4)2·3H2O.[93]

Actinides with oxidation state +6, except for the AnO22+-type cations, form [AnO4]2−, [An2O7]2− and other complex anions. For example, uranium, neptunium and plutonium form salts of the Na2UO4 (uranate) and (NH4)2U2O7 (diuranate) types. In comparison with lanthanides, actinides more easily form coordination compounds, and this ability increases with the actinide valence. Trivalent actinides do not form fluoride coordination compounds, whereas tetravalent thorium forms K2ThF6, KThF5, and even K5ThF9 complexes. Thorium also forms the corresponding sulfates (for example Na2SO4·Th(SO4)2·5H2O), nitrates and thiocyanates. Salts with the general formula An2Th(NO3)6·nH2O are of coordination nature, with the coordination number of thorium equal to 12. Even easier is to produce complex salts of pentavalent and hexavalent actinides. The most stable coordination compounds of actinides – tetravalent thorium and uranium – are obtained in reactions with diketones, e.g. acetylacetone.[93]

Applications

While actinides have some established daily-life applications, such as in smoke detectors (americium)[110][111] and gas mantles (thorium),[78] they are mostly used in nuclear weapons and as fuel in nuclear reactors.[78] The last two areas exploit the property of actinides to release enormous energy in nuclear reactions, which under certain conditions may become self-sustaining chain reactions.

The most important isotope for nuclear power applications is uranium-235. It is used in the thermal reactor, and its concentration in natural uranium does not exceed 0.72%. This isotope strongly absorbs thermal neutrons releasing much energy. One fission act of 1 gram of 235U converts into about 1 MW·day. Of importance, is that 235
92U
 emits more neutrons than it absorbs;[112] upon reaching the critical mass, 235
92U
 enters into a self-sustaining chain reaction.[72] Typically, uranium nucleus is divided into two fragments with the release of 2–3 neutrons, for example:

235
92U
 + 1
0n
 ⟶ 115
45Rh
 + 118
47Ag
 + 31
0n

Other promising actinide isotopes for nuclear power are thorium-232 and its product from the thorium fuel cycle, uranium-233.

Nuclear reactor[72][113][114]
The core of most Generation II nuclear reactors contains a set of hollow metal rods, usually made of zirconium alloys, filled with solid nuclear fuel pellets – mostly oxide, carbide, nitride or monosulfide of uranium, plutonium or thorium, or their mixture (the so-called MOX fuel). The most common fuel is oxide of uranium-235.

Fast neutrons are slowed by moderators, which contain water, carbon, deuterium, or beryllium, as thermal neutrons to increase the efficiency of their interaction with uranium-235. The rate of nuclear reaction is controlled by introducing additional rods made of boron or cadmium or a liquid absorbent, usually boric acid. Reactors for plutonium production are called breeder reactor or breeders; they have a different design and use fast neutrons.

Emission of neutrons during the fission of uranium is important not only for maintaining the nuclear chain reaction, but also for the synthesis of the heavier actinides. Uranium-239 converts via β-decay into plutonium-239, which, like uranium-235, is capable of spontaneous fission. The world's first nuclear reactors were built not for energy, but for producing plutonium-239 for nuclear weapons.

About half of produced thorium is used as the light-emitting material of gas mantles.[78] Thorium is also added into multicomponent alloys of magnesium and zinc. Mg-Th alloys are light and strong, but also have high melting point and ductility and thus are widely used in the aviation industry and in the production of missiles. Thorium also has good electron emission properties, with long lifetime and low potential barrier for the emission.[112] The relative content of thorium and uranium isotopes is widely used to estimate the age of various objects, including stars (see radiometric dating).[115]

The major application of plutonium has been in nuclear weapons, where the isotope plutonium-239 was a key component due to its ease of fission and availability. Plutonium-based designs allow reducing the critical mass to about a third of that for uranium-235.[116] The "Fat Man"-type plutonium bombs produced during the Manhattan Project used explosive compression of plutonium to obtain significantly higher densities than normal, combined with a central neutron source to begin the reaction and increase efficiency. Thus only 6.2 kg of plutonium was needed for an explosive yield equivalent to 20 kilotons of TNT.[117] (See also Nuclear weapon design.) Hypothetically, as little as 4 kg of plutonium—and maybe even less—could be used to make a single atomic bomb using very sophisticated assembly designs.[118]

Plutonium-238 is potentially more efficient isotope for nuclear reactors, since it has smaller critical mass than uranium-235, but it continues to release much thermal energy (0.56 W/g)[111][119] by decay even when the fission chain reaction is stopped by control rods. Its application is limited by its high price (about US$1000/g). This isotope has been used in thermopiles and water distillation systems of some space satellites and stations. The Galileo and Apollo spacecraft (e.g. Apollo 14[120]) had heaters powered by kilogram quantities of plutonium-238 oxide; this heat is also transformed into electricity with thermopiles. The decay of plutonium-238 produces relatively harmless alpha particles and is not accompanied by gamma rays. Therefore, this isotope (~160 mg) is used as the energy source in heart pacemakers where it lasts about 5 times longer than conventional batteries.[111]

Actinium-227 is used as a neutron source. Its high specific energy (14.5 W/g) and the possibility of obtaining significant quantities of thermally stable compounds are attractive for use in long-lasting thermoelectric generators for remote use. 228Ac is used as an indicator of radioactivity in chemical research, as it emits high-energy electrons (2.18 MeV) that can be easily detected. 228Ac-228Ra mixtures are widely used as an intense gamma-source in industry and medicine.[30]

Development of self-glowing actinide-doped materials with durable crystalline matrices is a new area of actinide utilization as the addition of alpha-emitting radionuclides to some glasses and crystals may confer luminescence.[121]

Toxicity

Radioactive substances can harm human health via (i) local skin contamination, (ii) internal exposure due to ingestion of radioactive isotopes, and (iii) external overexposure by β-activity and γ-radiation. Together with radium and transuranium elements, actinium is one of the most dangerous radioactive poisons with high specific α-activity. The most important feature of actinium is its ability to accumulate and remain in the surface layer of skeletons. At the initial stage of poisoning, actinium accumulates in the liver. Another danger of actinium is that it undergoes radioactive decay faster than being excreted. Adsorption from the digestive tract is much smaller (~0.05%) for actinium than radium.[30]

Protactinium in the body tends to accumulate in the kidneys and bones. The maximum safe dose of protactinium in the human body is 0.03 μCi that corresponds to 0.5 micrograms of 231Pa. This isotope, which might be present in the air as aerosol, is 2.5×108 times more toxic than hydrocyanic acid.[61]

Plutonium, when entering the body through air, food or blood (e.g. a wound), mostly settles in the lungs, liver and bones with only about 10% going to other organs, and remains there for decades. The long residence time of plutonium in the body is partly explained by its poor solubility in water. Some isotopes of plutonium emit ionizing α-radiation, which damages the surrounding cells. The median lethal dose (LD50) for 30 days in dogs after intravenous injection of plutonium is 0.32 milligram per kg of body mass, and thus the lethal dose for humans is approximately 22 mg for a person weighing 70 kg; the amount for respiratory exposure should be approximately four times greater. Another estimate assumes that plutonium is 50 times less toxic than radium, and thus permissible content of plutonium in the body should be 5 μg or 0.3 μCi. Such amount is nearly invisible under microscope. After trials on animals, this maximum permissible dose was reduced to 0.65 μg or 0.04 μCi. Studies on animals also revealed that the most dangerous plutonium exposure route is through inhalation, after which 5–25% of inhaled substances is retained in the body. Depending on the particle size and solubility of the plutonium compounds, plutonium is localized either in the lungs or in the lymphatic system, or is absorbed in the blood and then transported to the liver and bones. Contamination via food is the least likely way. In this case, only about 0.05% of soluble and 0.01% of insoluble compounds of plutonium absorbs into blood, and the rest is excreted. Exposure of damaged skin to plutonium would retain nearly 100% of it.[95]

Using actinides in nuclear fuel, sealed radioactive sources or advanced materials such as self-glowing crystals has many potential benefits. However, a serious concern is the extremely high radiotoxicity of actinides and their migration in the environment.[122] Use of chemically unstable forms of actinides in MOX and sealed radioactive sources is not appropriate by modern safety standards. There is a challenge to develop stable and durable actinide-bearing materials, which provide safe storage, use and final disposal. A key need is application of actinide solid solutions in durable crystalline host phases.[121]

Nuclear properties
Half-lives and branching fractions for actinides and natural decay products[123]
NuclideHalf-lifeDecay modeBranching fractionSource
206
81Tl
4.202 ± 0.011 mβ−1.0LNHB
208
81Tl
3.060 ± 0.008 mβ−1.0BIPM-5
210
82Pb
22.20 ± 0.22 yβ−1.0ENSDF
α( 1.9 ± 0.4 ) x 10−8
211
82Pb
36.1 ± 0.2 mβ−1.0ENSDF
212
82Pb
10.64 ± 0.01 hβ−1.0BIPM-5
214
82Pb
26.8 ± 0.9 mβ−1.0ENSDF
211
83Bi
2.14 ± 0.02 mβ−0.00276 ± 0.00004ENSDF
α0.99724 ± 0.00004
212
83Bi
60.54 ± 0.06 mα0.3593 ± 0.0007BIPM-5
β−0.6407 ± 0.0007
214
83Bi
19.9 ± 0.4 mα0.00021 ± 0.00001ENSDF
β−0.99979 ± 0.00001
210
84Po
138.376 ± 0.002 dα1.0ENSDF
219
86Rn
3.96 ± 0.01 sα1.0ENSDF
220
86Rn
55.8 ± 0.3 sα1.0BIPM-5
221
87Fr
4.9 ± 0.2 mβ−0.00005 ± 0.00003ENSDF
α0.99995 ± 0.00003
223
88Ra
11.43 ± 0.05 dα1.0ENSDF
14C( 8.9 ± 0.4 ) x 10−10
224
88Ra
3.627 ± 0.007 dα1.0BIPM-5
225
88Ra
14.9 ± 0.2 dβ−1.0ENSDF
226
88Ra
( 1.600 ± 0.007 ) x 103 yα1.0BIPM-5
228
88Ra
5.75 ± 0.03 yβ−1.0ENSDF
224
89Ac
2.78 ± 0.17 hα0.091 +0.020 -0.014ENSDF
EC0.909 +0.014 -0.020
225
89Ac
10.0 ± 0.1 dα1.0ENSDF
227
89Ac
21.772 ± 0.003 yα0.01380 ± 0.00004ENSDF
β−0.98620 ± 0.00004
228
89Ac
6.15 ± 0.02 hβ−1.0ENSDF
227
90Th
18.718 ± 0.005 dα1.0BIPM-5
228
90Th
698.60 ± 0.23 dα1.0BIPM-5
229
90Th
( 7.34 ± 0.16 ) x 103 yα1.0ENSDF
230
90Th
( 7.538 ± 0.030 ) x 104 yα1.0ENSDF
SF≤ 4 x 10−13
231
90Th
25.52 ± 0.01 hβ−1.0ENSDF
α~ 4 x 10−13
232
90Th
( 1.405 ± 0.006 ) x 1010 yα1.0ENSDF
SF( 1.1 ± 0.4 ) x 10−11
233
90Th
22.15 ± 0.15 mβ−1.0LNHB
234
90Th
24.10 ± 0.03 dβ−1.0ENSDF
231
91Pa
( 3.276 ± 0.011 ) x 104 yα1.0ENSDF
SF≤ 3 x 10−12
232
91Pa
1.32 ± 0.02 dEC0.00003 ± 0.00001ENSDF
β−0.99997 ± 0.00001
233
91Pa
26.98 ± 0.02 dβ−1.0LNHB
234
91Pa
6.70 ± 0.05 hβ−1.0ENSDF
234m
91Pa
1.159 ± 0.016 mIT0.0016 ± 0.0002IAEA-CRP-XG
β−0.9984 ± 0.0002
232
92U
68.9 ± 0.4 yα1.0ENSDF
SF
233
92U
( 1.592 ± 0.002 ) x 105 yα1.0ENSDF
SF
234
92U
( 2.455 ± 0.006 ) x 105 yα1.0LNHB
SF( 1.6 ± 0.2 ) x 10−11
235m
92U
26 ± 1 mIT1.0ENSDF
235
92U
( 7.038 ± 0.005 ) x 108 yα1.0ENSDF
SF( 7 ± 2 ) x 10−11
236
92U
( 2.342 ± 0.004 ) x 107 yα1.0ENSDF
SF( 9.4 ± 0.4 ) x 10−10
237
92U
6.749 ± 0.016 dβ−1.0LNHB
238
92U
( 4.468 ± 0.005 ) x 109 yα1.0LNHB
SF( 5.45 ± 0.04 ) x 10−7
239
92U
23.45 ± 0.02 mβ−1.0ENSDF
236
93Np
( 1.55 ± 0.08 ) x 105 yα0.0016 ± 0.0006LNHB
β−0.120 ± 0.006
EC0.878 ± 0.006
236m
93Np
22.5 ± 0.4 hβ−0.47 ± 0.01LNHB
EC0.53 ± 0.01
237
93Np
( 2.144 ± 0.007 ) x 106 yα1.0ENSDF
SF
238
93Np
2.117 ± 0.002 dβ−1.0ENSDF
239
93Np
2.356 ± 0.003 dβ−1.0ENSDF
236
94Pu
2.858 ± 0.008 yα1.0ENSDF
References
LNHB Laboratoire National Henri Becquerel, Recommended Data,

http://www.nucleide.org/DDEP_WG/DDEPdata.htm Archived 13 February 2021 at the Wayback Machine, 3 October 2006.

BIPM-5 M.-M. Bé, V. Chisté, C. Dulieu, E. Browne, V. Chechev, N. Kuzmenko, R. Helmer,

A. Nichols, E. Schönfeld, R. Dersch, Monographie BIPM-5, Table of Radionuclides, Vol. 2 – A = 151 to 242, 2004.

ENSDF "Evaluated Nuclear Structure Data File". Brookhaven National Laboratory. Retrieved 15 November 2006.
IAEA-CRP-XG M.-M. Bé, V. P. Chechev, R. Dersch, O. A. M. Helene, R. G. Helmer, M. Herman,

S. Hlavác, A. Marcinkowski, G. L. Molnár, A. L. Nichols, E. Schönfeld, V. R. Vanin, M. J. Woods, IAEA CRP "Update of X Ray and Gamma Ray Decay Data Standards for Detector Calibration and Other Applications", IAEA Scientific and Technical Information report STI/PUB/1287, May 2007, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria, ISBN 92-0-113606-4.

See also

Notes
  1. Nobelium and lawrencium were almost simultaneously discovered by Soviet and American scientists
  2. Specific activity is calculated by given in the table half-lives and the probability of spontaneous fission

References
  1. Theodore Gray (2009). The Elements: A Visual Exploration of Every Known Atom in the Universe. New York: Black Dog & Leventhal Publishers. p. 240. ISBN 978-1-57912-814-2.
  2. Morss, Lester; Asprey, Larned B. (1 August 2018). "Actinoid element". britannica.com. Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved 3 September 2020.
  3. Neil G. Connelly; et al. (2005). "Elements". Nomenclature of Inorganic Chemistry. London: Royal Society of Chemistry. p. 52. ISBN 978-0-85404-438-2.
  4. Greenwood, Norman N.; Earnshaw, Alan (1997). Chemistry of the Elements (2nd ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann. pp. 1230–1242. ISBN 978-0-08-037941-8.
  5. Jensen, William B. (2015). "The positions of lanthanum (actinium) and lutetium (lawrencium) in the periodic table: an update". Foundations of Chemistry. 17: 23–31. doi:10.1007/s10698-015-9216-1. S2CID 98624395. Retrieved 28 January 2021.
  6. Scerri, Eric (18 January 2021). "Provisional Report on Discussions on Group 3 of the Periodic Table". Chemistry International. 43 (1): 31–34. doi:10.1515/ci-2021-0115. S2CID 231694898.
  7. Neve, Francesco (2022). "Chemistry of superheavy transition metals". Journal of Coordination Chemistry. 75 (17–18): 2287–2307. doi:10.1080/00958972.2022.2084394. S2CID 254097024.
  8. Greenwood, p. 1250
  9. Fields, P.; Studier, M.; Diamond, H.; Mech, J.; Inghram, M.; Pyle, G.; Stevens, C.; Fried, S.; Manning, W.; et al. (1956). "Transplutonium Elements in Thermonuclear Test Debris". Physical Review. 102 (1): 180–182. Bibcode:1956PhRv..102..180F. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.102.180.
  10. Greenwood, p. 1252
  11. Myasoedov, p. 7
  12. E. Fermi (1934). "Possible Production of Elements of Atomic Number Higher than 92". Nature. 133 (3372): 898–899. Bibcode:1934Natur.133..898F. doi:10.1038/133898a0.
  13. Mehra, Jagdish; Rechenberg, Helmut (2001). The historical development of quantum theory. Springer. p. 966. ISBN 978-0-387-95086-0.
  14. Seaborg, G. T. (1994). "118 – Origin of the actinide concept". In K.A. Gschneidner Jr., L; Eyring, G.R. Choppin; G.H. Landet (eds.). Handbook on the Physics and Chemistry of Rare Earths. Vol. 18 – Lanthanides/Actinides: Chemistry. Elsevier. pp. 4–6, 10–14.
  15. Wallmann, J. C. (1959). "The first isolations of the transuranium elements: A historical survey". Journal of Chemical Education. 36 (7): 340. Bibcode:1959JChEd..36..340W. doi:10.1021/ed036p340.
  16. Myasoedov, p. 9
  17. Myasoedov, p. 14
  18. Martin Heinrich Klaproth (1789). "Chemische Untersuchung des Uranits, einer neuentdeckten metallischen Substanz". Chemische Annalen. 2: 387–403.
  19. E.-M. Péligot (1842). "Recherches Sur L'Uranium". Annales de chimie et de physique. 5 (5): 5–47.
  20. Ingmar Grenthe (2006). "Uranium". The Chemistry of the Actinide and Transactinide Elements. pp. 253–698. doi:10.1007/1-4020-3598-5_5. ISBN 978-1-4020-3555-5.
  21. K. Zimmerman, Ann., 213, 290 (1882); 216, 1 (1883); Ber. 15 (1882) 849
  22. Golub, p. 214
  23. Berzelius, J. J. (1829). "Untersuchung eines neues Minerals und einer darin erhalten zuvor unbekannten Erde (Investigation of a new mineral and of a previously unknown earth contained therein)". Annalen der Physik und Chemie. 16 (7): 385–415. Bibcode:1829AnP....92..385B. doi:10.1002/andp.18290920702. (modern citation: Annalen der Physik, vol. 92, no. 7, pp. 385–415)
  24. Berzelius, J. J. (1829). "Undersökning af ett nytt mineral (Thorit), som innehåller en förut obekant jord" (Investigation of a new mineral (thorite), as contained in a previously unknown earth)" (PDF). Kungliga Svenska Vetenskaps Akademiens Handlingar (Transactions of the Royal Swedish Science Academy): 1–30. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022.
  25. André-Louis Debierne (1899). "Sur un nouvelle matière radio-active". Comptes Rendus (in French). 129: 593–595.
  26. André-Louis Debierne (1900–1901). "Sur un nouvelle matière radio-actif – l'actinium". Comptes Rendus (in French). 130: 906–908.
  27. H. W. Kirby (1971). "The Discovery of Actinium". Isis. 62 (3): 290–308. doi:10.1086/350760. JSTOR 229943. S2CID 144651011.
  28. J. P. Adloff (2000). "The centenary of a controversial discovery: actinium". Radiochim. Acta. 88 (3–4_2000): 123–128. doi:10.1524/ract.2000.88.3-4.123. S2CID 94016074.
  29. Golub, p. 213
  30. Z. K. Karalova; B. Myasoedov (1982). Actinium. Analytical chemistry items. Moscow: Nauka.
  31. Hakala, Reino W. (1952). "Letters". Journal of Chemical Education. 29 (11): 581. Bibcode:1952JChEd..29..581H. doi:10.1021/ed029p581.2.
  32. George B. Kauffman (1997). "Victor Moritz Goldschmidt (1888–1947): A Tribute to the Founder of Modern Geochemistry on the Fiftieth Anniversary of His Death". The Chemical Educator. 2 (5): 1–26. doi:10.1007/s00897970143a. S2CID 101664962.
  33. John Emsley (2001). "Protactinium". Nature's Building Blocks: An A-Z Guide to the Elements. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. pp. 347–349. ISBN 978-0-19-850340-8.
  34. K. Fajans; O. Gohring (1913). "Über die komplexe Natur des Ur X". Naturwissenschaften. 1 (14): 339. Bibcode:1913NW......1..339F. doi:10.1007/BF01495360. S2CID 40667401.
  35. K. Fajans; O. Gohring (1913). "Über das Uran X2-das neue Element der Uranreihe". Physikalische Zeitschrift. 14: 877–84.
  36. Greenwood, p. 1251
  37. Edwin McMillan; Abelson, Philip (1940). "Radioactive Element 93". Physical Review. 57 (12): 1185–1186. Bibcode:1940PhRv...57.1185M. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.57.1185.2.
  38. V.A. Mikhailov, ed. (1971). Analytical chemistry of neptunium. Moscow: Nauka.
  39. Hanford Cultural Resources Program, US Department of Energy (2002). Hanford Site Historic District: History of the Plutonium Production Facilities, 1943–1990. Columbus OH: Battelle Press. pp. 1.22–1.27. doi:10.2172/807939. ISBN 978-1-57477-133-6.
  40. Nina Hall (2000). The New Chemistry: A Showcase for Modern Chemistry and Its Applications. Cambridge University Press. pp. 8–9. ISBN 978-0-521-45224-3.
  41. Myasoedov, p. 8
  42. Thompson, S. G.; Ghiorso, A.; Seaborg, G. T. (1950). "Element 97". Phys. Rev. 77 (6): 838–839. Bibcode:1950PhRv...77..838T. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.77.838.2.
  43. Thompson, S. G.; Ghiorso, A.; Seaborg, G. T. (1950). "The New Element Berkelium (Atomic Number 97)". Phys. Rev. 80 (5): 781–789. Bibcode:1950PhRv...80..781T. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.80.781.
  44. Wallace W. Schulz (1976) The Chemistry of Americium, U.S. Department of Commerce, p. 1
  45. Thompson, S.; Ghiorso, A.; Seaborg, G. (1950). "Element 97". Physical Review. 77 (6): 838–839. Bibcode:1950PhRv...77..838T. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.77.838.2.
  46. Thompson, S.; Ghiorso, A.; Seaborg, G. (1950). "The New Element Berkelium (Atomic Number 97)". Physical Review. 80 (5): 781–789. Bibcode:1950PhRv...80..781T. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.80.781.
  47. S. G. Thompson; K. Street Jr.; A. Ghiorso; G. T. Seaborg (1950). "Element 98". Physical Review. 78 (3): 298–299. Bibcode:1950PhRv...78..298T. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.78.298.2.
  48. S. G. Thompson; K. Street Jr.; A. Ghiorso; G. T. Seaborg (1950). "The New Element Californium (Atomic Number 98)" (PDF). Physical Review. 80 (5): 790–796. Bibcode:1950PhRv...80..790T. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.80.790. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022.
  49. K. Street Jr.; S. G. Thompson; G. T. Seaborg (1950). "Chemical Properties of Californium". J. Am. Chem. Soc. 72 (10): 4832–4835. doi:10.1021/ja01166a528. hdl:2027/mdp.39015086449173. Archived from the original on 15 May 2016. Retrieved 23 October 2010.
  50. S. G. Thompson and B. B. Cunningham (1958) "First Macroscopic Observations of the Chemical Properties of Berkelium and Californium", supplement to Paper P/825 presented at the Second Intl. Conf., Peaceful Uses Atomic Energy, Geneva
  51. Darleane C. Hoffman, Albert Ghiorso, Glenn Theodore Seaborg (2000) The transuranium people: the inside story, Imperial College Press, ISBN 1-86094-087-0, pp. 141–142
  52. A. Ghiorso; S. G. Thompson; G. H. Higgins; G. T. Seaborg; M. H. Studier; P. R. Fields; S. M. Fried; H. Diamond; J. F. Mech; G. L. Pyle; J. R. Huizenga; A. Hirsch; W. M. Manning; C. I. Browne; H. L. Smith; R. W. Spence (1955). "New Elements Einsteinium and Fermium, Atomic Numbers 99 and 100". Phys. Rev. 99 (3): 1048–1049. Bibcode:1955PhRv...99.1048G. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.99.1048.
  53. S. Thompson; A. Ghiorso; B. G. Harvey; G. R. Choppin (1954). "Transcurium Isotopes Produced in the Neutron Irradiation of Plutonium". Physical Review. 93 (4): 908. Bibcode:1954PhRv...93..908T. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.93.908.
  54. G. R. Choppin; S. G. Thompson; A. Ghiorso; B. G. Harvey (1954). "Nuclear Properties of Some Isotopes of Californium, Elements 99 and 100". Physical Review. 94 (4): 1080–1081. Bibcode:1954PhRv...94.1080C. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.94.1080.
  55. Albert Ghiorso (2003). "Einsteinium and Fermium". Chemical and Engineering News. 81 (36).
  56. A. Ghiorso; B. Harvey; G. Choppin; S. Thompson; G. Seaborg (1955). New Element Mendelevium, Atomic Number 101. Vol. 98. pp. 1518–1519. Bibcode:1955PhRv...98.1518G. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.98.1518. ISBN 978-981-02-1440-1. {{cite book}}: |journal= ignored (help)
  57. Kondev, F. G.; Wang, M.; Huang, W. J.; Naimi, S.; Audi, G. (2021). "The NUBASE2020 evaluation of nuclear properties" (PDF). Chinese Physics C. 45 (3): 030001. doi:10.1088/1674-1137/abddae.
  58. "Table of nuclides, IAEA". Retrieved 7 July 2010.
  59. Myasoedov, pp. 19–21
  60. Greenwood, p. 1254
  61. E.S. Palshin (1968). Analytical chemistry of protactinium. Moscow: Nauka.
  62. I.P. Alimarin (1962). A.P. Vinogradov (ed.). Analytical chemistry of uranium. Moscow: Publisher USSR Academy of Sciences.
  63. Myasoedov, p. 18
  64. Myasoedov, p. 22
  65. Myasoedov, p. 25
  66. "Table of elements, compounds, isotopes" (in Russian). Archived from the original on 12 July 2010. Retrieved 7 July 2010.
  67. Standard Atomic Weights 2013. Commission on Isotopic Abundances and Atomic Weights
  68. Soppera, N.; Bossant, M.; Dupont, E. (2014). "JANIS 4: An Improved Version of the NEA Java-based Nuclear Data Information System". Nuclear Data Sheets. 120. Elsevier BV: 294–296. Bibcode:2014NDS...120..294S. doi:10.1016/j.nds.2014.07.071.
  69. Matthew W. Francis et al. (2014). Reactor fuel isotopics and code validation for nuclear applications. ORNL/TM-2014/464, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, p. 11
  70. Jay H. Lehr; Janet K. Lehr (2000). Standard handbook of environmental science, health, and technology. McGraw-Hill Professional. pp. 2–38. ISBN 978-0-07-038309-8.
  71. Lide, D. R., ed. (2005). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (86th ed.). Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press. ISBN 0-8493-0486-5.
  72. Yu.D. Tretyakov, ed. (2007). Non-organic chemistry in three volumes. Chemistry of transition elements. Vol. 3. Moscow: Academy. ISBN 978-5-7695-2533-9.
  73. "World Uranium Mining". World Nuclear Association. Archived from the original on 26 June 2010. Retrieved 11 June 2010.
  74. F. Weigel; J. Katz; G. Seaborg (1997). The Chemistry of the Actinide Elements. Vol. 2. Moscow: Mir. ISBN 978-5-03-001885-0.
  75. Thorium, USGS Mineral Commodities
  76. Golub, pp. 215–217
  77. Greenwood, pp. 1255, 1261
  78. Greenwood, p. 1255
  79. A. E. van Arkel; de Boer, J. H. (1925). "Darstellung von reinem Titanium-, Zirkonium-, Hafnium- und Thoriummetall". Zeitschrift für Anorganische und Allgemeine Chemie (in German). 148 (1): 345–350. doi:10.1002/zaac.19251480133.
  80. Hamilton, David C. (1965). "Position of Lanthanum in the Periodic Table". American Journal of Physics. 33 (8): 637–640. Bibcode:1965AmJPh..33..637H. doi:10.1119/1.1972042.
  81. Tomeček, Josef; Li, Cen; Schreckenbach, Georg (2023). "Actinium coordination chemistry: A density functional theory study with monodentate and bidentate ligands". Journal of Computational Chemistry. 44 (3): 334–345. doi:10.1002/jcc.26929. PMID 35668552. S2CID 249433367.
  82. Johnson, David (1984). The Periodic Law (PDF). The Royal Society of Chemistry. ISBN 0-85186-428-7.
  83. I.L. Knunyants (1961). Short Chemical Encyclopedia. Vol. 1. Moscow: Soviet Encyclopedia.
  84. Golub, pp. 218–219
  85. Greenwood, p. 1263
  86. John Emsley (2011). Nature's Building Blocks: An A-Z Guide to the Elements (New ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-960563-7.
  87. Peterson, Ivars (7 December 1991). "Uranium displays rare type of radioactivity". Science News. Archived from the original on 18 January 2012.
  88. Greenwood, p. 1265
  89. Domanov, V. P.; Lobanov, Yu. V. (October 2011). "Formation of volatile curium(VI) trioxide CmO3". Radiochemistry. 53 (5): 453–456. doi:10.1134/S1066362211050018. ISSN 1066-3622. S2CID 98052484.
  90. Greenwood, p. 1264
  91. General Properties and Reactions of the Actinides. LibreTexts. 22 May 2015. Many actinide metals, hydrides, carbides, alloys and other compounds may ignite at room temperature in a finely divided state.
  92. Myasoedov, pp. 30–31
  93. Golub, pp. 222–227
  94. Greenwood, p. 1278
  95. B.A. Nadykto; L.F.Timofeeva, eds. (2003). Plutonium. Fundamental Problems. Vol. 1. Sarov: VNIIEF. ISBN 978-5-9515-0024-3.
  96. M. S. Milyukova (1965). Analytical chemistry of plutonium. Moscow: Nauka. ISBN 978-0-250-39918-5.
  97. Myasoedov, pp. 25–29
  98. Deblonde, Gauthier J.-P.; Sturzbecher-Hoehne, Manuel; Jong, Wibe A. de; Brabec, Jiri; Corie Y. Ralston; Illy, Marie-Claire; An, Dahlia D.; Rupert, Peter B.; Strong, Roland K. (September 2017). "Chelation and stabilization of berkelium in oxidation state +IV". Nature Chemistry. 9 (9): 843–849. Bibcode:2017NatCh...9..843D. doi:10.1038/nchem.2759. ISSN 1755-4349. OSTI 1436161. PMID 28837177.
  99. Myasoedov, p. 88
  100. "Таблица Inorganic and Coordination compounds" (in Russian). Retrieved 11 July 2010.
  101. According to other sources, cubic sesquioxide of curium is olive-green. See "Соединения curium site XuMuK.ru" (in Russian). Archived from the original on 18 August 2010. Retrieved 11 July 2010.
  102. The atmosphere during the synthesis affects the lattice parameters, which might be due to non-stoichiometry as a result of oxidation or reduction of the trivalent californium. Main form is the cubic oxide of californium(III).
  103. Greenwood, p. 1268
  104. L.R. Morss; Norman M. Edelstein; Jean Fuger (2011). The Chemistry of the Actinide and Transactinide Elements (Set Vol.1–6). Springer. p. 2139. ISBN 978-94-007-0210-3.
  105. Krivovichev, Sergei; Burns, Peter; Tananaev, Ivan (2006). "Chapter 3". Structural Chemistry of Inorganic Actinide Compounds. Elsevier. pp. 67–78. ISBN 978-0-08-046791-7.
  106. Greenwood, p. 1270
  107. Myasoedov, pp. 96–99
  108. Nave, S.; Haire, R.; Huray, Paul (1983). "Magnetic properties of actinide elements having the 5f6 and 5f7 electronic configurations". Physical Review B. 28 (5): 2317–2327. Bibcode:1983PhRvB..28.2317N. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.28.2317.
  109. Greenwood, p.1269
  110. Smoke Detectors and Americium, Nuclear Issues Briefing Paper 35, May 2002
  111. Greenwood, p. 1262
  112. Golub, pp. 220–221
  113. G. G. Bartolomei; V. D. Baybakov; M. S. Alkhutov; G. A. Bach (1982). Basic theories and methods of calculation of nuclear reactors. Moscow: Energoatomizdat.
  114. Greenwood, pp. 1256–1261
  115. Sergey Popov; Alexander Sergeev (2008). "Universal Alchemy". Vokrug Sveta (in Russian). 2811 (4).
  116. David L. Heiserman (1992). "Element 94: Plutonium". Exploring Chemical Elements and their Compounds. New York: TAB Books. p. 338. ISBN 978-0-8306-3018-9.
  117. John Malik (September 1985). The Yields of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki Explosions (PDF). Los Alamos. p. Table VI. LA-8819. Archived (PDF) from the original on 24 February 2009. Retrieved 15 February 2009.
  118. "Nuclear Weapon Design". Federation of American Scientists. 1998. Archived from the original on 26 December 2008. Retrieved 7 December 2008.
  119. John Holdren and Matthew Bunn Nuclear Weapons Design & Materials. Project on Managing the Atom (MTA) for NTI. 25 November 2002
  120. Apollo 14 Press Kit – 01/11/71, NASA, pp. 38–39
  121. B.E. Burakov; M.I Ojovan; W.E. Lee (2010). Crystalline Materials for Actinide Immobilisation. World Scientific. ISBN 978-1-84816-418-5.
  122. M. I. Ojovan; W.E. Lee (2005). An Introduction to Nuclear Waste Immobilisation. Amsterdam: Elsevier. ISBN 978-0-08-044462-8.
  123. "Half-lives and branching fractions for actinides and natural decay products". www-nds.iaea.org. IAEA. Retrieved 29 September 2018.

Bibliography
  • Golub, A. M. (1971). Общая и неорганическая химия (General and Inorganic Chemistry). Vol. 2.
  • Greenwood, Norman N.; Earnshaw, Alan (1997). Chemistry of the Elements (2nd ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann. ISBN 978-0-08-037941-8.
  • Myasoedov, B. (1972). Analytical chemistry of transplutonium elements. Moscow: Nauka. ISBN 978-0-470-62715-0.
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Actinides.

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.